Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

Hi Rémy, > Hi, > > Ok, it seems to be great. We had many problems with RPM, R, or Perl > packages not maintained/"downloadable" any more. The only SPOF I see now is > Github itself and the Cargo-Port source code ;) Perhaps you should try to > add it to python/pip ? Carogo-port is already pip

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

Hi Peter, On 01/02/2016 11:54 PM, Peter Cock wrote: > > > On Friday, 1 January 2016, Björn Grüning > wrote: > > Hi Galaxy developers, > > this is a RFC to get the implementation details right for a new action > type in

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new

On Friday, 1 January 2016, Björn Grüning wrote: > Hi Galaxy developers, > > this is a RFC to get the implementation details right for a new action > type in `tool_dependencies.xml`. > > Since years we try to save a very crucial sustainability problem: >

[galaxy-dev] RFC: new

Hi Galaxy developers, this is a RFC to get the implementation details right for a new action type in `tool_dependencies.xml`. Since years we try to save a very crucial sustainability problem: **Non-sustainable links**! A little bit of history At first we tried to

Re: [galaxy-dev] RFC: new param attribute for Galaxy tool XML

Hi Björn, Command line arguments are often case sensitive (e.g. samtools switches), but are Galaxy parameter names? Peter On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Björn Grüning bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, we are planning to work on a project to implement a Galaxy fuse based shell.

[galaxy-dev] RFC: new param attribute for Galaxy tool XML

Hi all, we are planning to work on a project to implement a Galaxy fuse based shell. Probably starting with the work from Clare [1]. Next to our Galaxy IPython integration it should attract more bioinformaticians and should offer a new way to interact with Galaxy. This includes moving, deleting