Hi Maria,
I didn't notice any obvious problematic usage, format, or content issues
with the Tuxedo pipeline execution in your history. Your protocol is
right on track. This leaves data and parameter inputs to consider.
I did notice that you are mainly using defaults and omitting the use of
r
> 1. I tested it using a bigWig and a BED file. Both were loaded nicely in
> Circos, but I was surprised to see that the visualization of both files
> looked exactly the same, i.e. both file types seemed to be interpreted as
> histograms/coverage data. From the Circos plots I've seen in publicat
2 matches
Mail list logo
