Re: [Gambas-user] Autotools packaging ???

2015-03-18 Thread adamn...@gmail.com
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:40:54 +0100 Benoît Minisini wrote: > Le 19/03/2015 00:38, adamn...@gmail.com a écrit : > > Something has happened that I don't quite understand. > > > > For several years we have used autotools packaging to distribute our stuff > > to clients. > > The IDE options for packa

Re: [Gambas-user] Issue 610 in gambas: Debian packaging of control: Depends only gambas3-runtime

2015-03-18 Thread gambas
Comment #1 on issue 610 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Debian packaging of control: Depends only gambas3-runtime https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=610 Please provide the project. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to th

Re: [Gambas-user] Autotools packaging ???

2015-03-18 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 19/03/2015 00:38, adamn...@gmail.com a écrit : > Something has happened that I don't quite understand. > > For several years we have used autotools packaging to distribute our stuff to > clients. > The IDE options for packaging have always been: > Vendor Name="Paddys-Hill" > Prefix package name

[Gambas-user] Autotools packaging ???

2015-03-18 Thread adamn...@gmail.com
Something has happened that I don't quite understand. For several years we have used autotools packaging to distribute our stuff to clients. The IDE options for packaging have always been: Vendor Name="Paddys-Hill" Prefix package name with the vendor name=Yes This has always worked up till the

Re: [Gambas-user] Possible error PPA 3.7 Stable

2015-03-18 Thread Gian
Ok thank you very much for the update but we mark that has remained the written of the Trunk version. See image attached Regards Gianluigi -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsore

Re: [Gambas-user] Possible error PPA 3.7 Stable

2015-03-18 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 18/03/2015 15:54, Sebastian Kulesz a écrit : > Thats because the version in the 3.7 branch was updated to 3.7.90 when it > should have stayed in 3.7.0. I have included a patch to the build system to > revert the commit. I will publish an update shortly. > > Thanks for pointing it out! > Oops, s

Re: [Gambas-user] Possible error PPA 3.7 Stable

2015-03-18 Thread Lewis Balentine
In 'update manager' is listed as: gambas3 Gambas compression component 3.7.0-24.30~ubuntu14.01 (I assume this is related to the same issue , but I could be wrong). Lewis On 03/18/2015 07:38 AM, Gian wrote: > Upon notification by a user of Gambas-it I tried to install the PPA > stable. > Seems

Re: [Gambas-user] Possible error PPA 3.7 Stable

2015-03-18 Thread Sebastian Kulesz
Thats because the version in the 3.7 branch was updated to 3.7.90 when it should have stayed in 3.7.0. I have included a patch to the build system to revert the commit. I will publish an update shortly. Thanks for pointing it out! On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Gian wrote: > Upon notification

[Gambas-user] Maskbox mask & text entry

2015-03-18 Thread John Rose
I have a Maskbox with mask [A-Za-z][A-Za-z]. I noticed that the IDE does not show the MaxLength property. I want the user to be able to enter lower case & have the entry displayed as upper case for either of the 2 characters. When I run the attached Test app, it only seems to allow the entry of 1 c

[Gambas-user] Issue 610 in gambas: Debian packaging of control: Depends only gambas3-runtime

2015-03-18 Thread gambas
Status: New Owner: Labels: Version-TRUNK Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any Desktop-Any GUI-Any New issue 610 by chr4...@googlemail.com: Debian packaging of control: Depends only gambas3-runtime https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=610 1) Describe the probl

Re: [Gambas-user] Bizarre results when entering a £ symbol into a TextArea or TextBox

2015-03-18 Thread John Rose
Jussi, Since you are top posting, I shall also top post: hopefully, it won't start another long discussion. Thanks for the suggestion about using String methods. The Test app now works properly using the String methods. Also, the = and &= operators work OK for strings containing non-ASCII charact