Please next time include screenshot of the error message.
Jussi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Gianluigi wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
> I can not explain better than that.
> It happened yesterday to my wife when she tried the update.
> Ubuntu has prevented this with a message
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.892=L21haW4-
Comment #1 by Benoît MINISINI:
Now libraries must be installed in /lib/gambas3/.
I.e., if you install gambas in /usr/local/bin, then the libraries must be
installed in /usr/local/lib/gambas3/, being the name of the
library
Hi Benoit,
I can not explain better than that.
It happened yesterday to my wife when she tried the update.
Ubuntu has prevented this with a message similar to the one I told you.
Few minutes ago we have upgraded Ubuntu and then Gambas without any
problems, excuse the noise.
I think that was
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.889=L21haW4-
Benoît MINISINI changed the state of the bug to: Fixed.
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM:
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.889=L21haW4-
Comment #10 by Charlie REINL:
YES now it works immediately after making the executables
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
Hi.
Tested from trunk with svn. No luck. I understand this may not be a priority
but, Fabien, would you be kind and attach the patch that fixes the bug?
Thank you.
Peter
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 4:11 AM
From: "Fabien Bodard"
To:
OK, next time (I hope never) we will try to be more accurate.
Gianluigi
2016-02-11 15:32 GMT+01:00 Jussi Lahtinen :
> Please next time include screenshot of the error message.
>
>
> Jussi
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Gianluigi wrote:
>
> >
Le 11/02/2016 14:00, Peter Roc a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> Tested from trunk with svn. No luck. I understand this may not be a
> priority
> but, Fabien, would you be kind and attach the patch that fixes the bug?
> Thank you.
>
> Peter
>
Sorry for the delay, I will look at the
Benoît, thank you for your reply.
You can take your time, it's not urgent, I have tested a simple workaround,
with MaskBox_Change() and Replace$ a few minutes ago. It's an inconvenience
because there are several maskboxes in a few forms, but i can do the demo
without the users