the packages are basically the old gambas2 debian packages with 2
replaced by 3 (and using the gambas3 source of course)
Some changes to dependencies are also required to make them build.
However I haven't changed the structure and names of the packages,
these seem to follow the guidelines
2011/3/21 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
1) I don't see where are all the individual binary packages (gambas3-runtime,
gambas3-dev...) on the launchpad link you sent.
https://launchpad.net/~ihaywood3/+archive/gambas3/+sourcepub/1558737/+listing-archive-extra
2011/3/21 Ian Haywood ihayw...@iinet.net.au
2011/3/21 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
1) I don't see where are all the individual binary packages
(gambas3-runtime,
gambas3-dev...) on the launchpad link you sent.
2011/3/21 Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com
2011/3/21 Ian Haywood ihayw...@iinet.net.au
2011/3/21 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
1) I don't see where are all the individual binary packages
(gambas3-runtime,
gambas3-dev...) on the launchpad link you sent.
It seem there is a problem with the naming of gb.qt4 packages components,
it should be gambas3-gb-qt4 instead of gambas3-gb-qt,
also gambas3-gb-opengl-glsl is missing, it's not a part of
gambas-gb-opengl package.
Regards,
Laurent Carlier
Also there is no gambas3-gb-form-stock
2011/3/21 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
1) I don't see where are all the individual binary packages
(gambas3-runtime, gambas3-dev...) on the launchpad link you sent.
https://launchpad.net/~ihaywood3/+archive/gambas3/+sourcepub/1558737/+listi
ng-archive-extra
You should
Le 21 mars 2011 21:38, Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
It seem there is a problem with the naming of gb.qt4 packages
components,
it should be gambas3-gb-qt4 instead of gambas3-gb-qt,
also gambas3-gb-opengl-glsl is missing, it's not a part of
gambas-gb-opengl
Also there is no gambas3-gb-form-stock package in the wiki package list
++
Fixed in the wiki page.
--
Benoît Minisini
What package depend on this component ?
gb.form.stock depends on nothing. It is just an hidden component used for
storing stock icon files. It
Oups sorry,
On Fedora 14, Gambas 2.99 RC1
Olivier Cruilles
Mail: linu...@club-internet.fr
Le 21 mars 2011 à 22:05, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
--
Benoît Minisini
--
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active
Il giorno sab, 19/03/2011 alle 15.30 +0100, Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar.bz2/download
Ok on Ubuntu 10.10 X86_64
Did you run ./reconf-all before running ./configure ?
Yes!
Am 20.03.2011 01:37, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
SUSE 11.2:
Compiling runs into error in 'make':
/bin/sh../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc
-DGAMBAS_PATH=\/usr/local/bin\ -pipe -Wall
2011/3/20 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
2011/3/20 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
And for those who can make binary packages: can you try to make a
binary package from this source package and tell me if you get any
problem? That way, I hope that packaging
Did you run ./reconf-all before running ./configure ?
Yes!
Well. Normally, when running the ./reconf-all script, all libtool macro files
inside the m4 directory should be replaced by what is installed on your
system.
So:
1) Can you check that libtool is installed on your system?
2)
3) Can you tell me if you find on your system the libtool macro files
having the same name as the one located in the m4 directory?
For example, on Ubuntu, there are in /usr/share/aclocal.
--
Benoît Minisini
--
Am 20.03.2011 18:05, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
2) Can you compare the contents of the m4 directory between before
running ./reconf-all (just after the source package has been
extracted), and just after?
The only change: a file argz.m4 is added. See before/after screenshots.
I also append
I removed all those files, and things definitely got better. Now, during
./reconf-all, the libtool macro files are copied from my system to the m4
directories.
So, I think removing these files would be better.
I still get (another) error in 'make', but maybe I deleted something that
Here is the complete protocol of ./reconf-all, ./configure -C and make.
Maybe there is an error before 'make'.
Error messages at the end of make:
Für das Ziel »all-am« ist nichts zu tun. = For the target »all-am« there is
nothing to do.
*** Keine Regel, um »all« zu erstellen. Schluss. = No rule
Here is the complete protocol of ./reconf-all, ./configure -C and make.
Maybe there is an error before 'make'.
Error messages at the end of make:
Für das Ziel »all-am« ist nichts zu tun. = For the target »all-am« there
is nothing to do.
*** Keine Regel, um »all« zu erstellen. Schluss. =
Didn't see that. But I knew I wasn't careful enough deleting those files...
I will start again and tell you.
Am 20.03.2011 19:37, schrieb Benoît Minisini:
Didn't you see the syntax error message during the configuration of
gb.sdl.sound? It should mean that the gbsdl.m4 file is missing in the
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar.bz2/download
Please can you try to compile it on your own distribution and tell me if you
encounter any problem?
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar.bz2
/download
Please can you try to compile it on
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar.bz2
/download
Please can you try to compile it on
Just use this command to generate it:
./reconf-all
Olivier Cruilles
Mail: linu...@club-internet.fr
Le 19 mars 2011 à 16:53, Laurent Carlier a écrit :
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar.bz2
/download
Please can you try to compile it on
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the
first release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar.b
z2 /download
Please can you try to
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the
first release candidate. There:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gambas/files/gambas3/gambas3-2.99.0.tar
.b z2 /download
Please can you
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 18:39:47, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
I succeeded in compiling the package on Ubuntu 10.10 with no problem...
Did you do a ./reconf-all and then ./configure ?
Damn, i've done ./reconf instead of ./reconf-all, that must be the
culprit...
Sorry for the noise.
++
: [Gambas-user] Gambas 3 RC1 pre-release source package
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:30:02 +0100
From: Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net
To: gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the first
release candidate
SUSE 11.2:
Compiling runs into error in 'make':
/bin/sh../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc
-DGAMBAS_PATH=\/usr/local/bin\ -pipe -Wall -Wno-unused-value
-fsigned-char -fvisibility=hidden -g -Os -I../share -o gbc3
Le dimanche 20 mars 2011 01:40:32, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Le samedi 19 mars 2011 15:30:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
Hi,
I have uploaded a pre-release of the Gambas 3 source package for the
first release candidate. There:
2011/3/20 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
And for those who can make binary packages: can you try to make a binary
package from this source package and tell me if you get any problem? That
way, I hope that packaging problems will be fixed before the final
release!
2011/3/20 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
2011/3/20 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net:
And for those who can make binary packages: can you try to make a binary
package from this source package and tell me if you get any problem? That
way, I hope that packaging
32 matches
Mail list logo
