Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 129 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
large ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
It should be fixed in revision #4208. I remove the optimization until I
find a good one.
-
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #5 on issue 129 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
large ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
Aaaarg... You're right!
--
The demand for
Comment #4 on issue 129 by emil.len...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
large ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
But that solution is incorrect; it makes bug #95 valid again :p
--
The dema
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 129 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
large ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
Fixed in revision #4206.
--
The demand for I
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: -Version Version-TRUNK
Comment #2 on issue 129 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
large ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #1 on issue 129 by emil.len...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
large ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
A working alternative to the current MUST_CONTINUE-macros would be the
following pseudo code:
if (val == end) continue loop;
else {
int sign1 = v
Are you running on a 32 or 64 bit OS?
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 23:10 +, gam...@googlecode.com wrote:
> Status: New
> Owner:
> Labels: Version Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any
> Desktop-Any GUI-Any
>
> New issue 129 by emil.len...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Version Type-Bug Priority-Medium OpSys-Any Dist-Any Arch-Any
Desktop-Any GUI-Any
New issue 129 by emil.len...@gmail.com: For-loop does not work on large
ranges
http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=129
1) Describe the problem.
For-loop does not work
