Re: [Gambas-user] Maybe (still) a bug in bit manipulation functions

2009-03-30 Thread Leonardo Miliani
BenoƮt Minisini ha scritto: It seems that there are bugs in the Ror function too. Using the same number, 197 (11000101), if I write ROR(197,3) I get -1610612712 ( 10111000) instead of 10111000 (184). 197 is not a Byte, it is an

[Gambas-user] Maybe (still) a bug in bit manipulation functions

2009-03-29 Thread Leonardo Miliani
I made some tests on bit manipulation functions and I think I've found some bugs in them (Gambas 2.12.0). I read in the documentation that a function like SHL should keep care of the initial type of data. I.e., if I use a byte, it should work using 8 bits (the lenght of a byte), if I use an

Re: [Gambas-user] Maybe (still) a bug in bit manipulation functions

2009-03-29 Thread Leonardo Miliani
It seems that there are bugs in the Ror function too. Using the same number, 197 (11000101), if I write ROR(197,3) I get -1610612712 ( 10111000) instead of 10111000 (184). -- Leonardo Miliani Web: www.leonardomiliani.com E-mail: