Greetings all,
I have created a Gambas project - after creating a "Make Executable"
file it will run as expected on the
development system BUT when I try to make a installation package it says
that "makepkg" and "makeself"
files are missing.
Doing a system search - the "makepkg" is on the
Le 09/12/2014 16:26, Tobias Boege a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> there is a visual bug in the Make -> Installation package dialog. The line
> numbers are covered by the text in the Editor. See attached screenshot from
> a Ubuntu system. It happens on my Arch Linux, too. Anything else needed?
>
> Regards,
> To
Hi,
there is a visual bug in the Make -> Installation package dialog. The line
numbers are covered by the text in the Editor. See attached screenshot from
a Ubuntu system. It happens on my Arch Linux, too. Anything else needed?
Regards,
Tobi
--
"There's an old saying: Don't change anything... e
Den 20. sep. 2014 20:26, skrev Benoît Minisini:
> Le 20/09/2014 15:29, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>> Hi! It is getting somewhere, but not quite there yet, it seems. I can
>> now make a package, but when I try to install it (no matter which one) I
>> get some error messages about the package file:
>
Le 20/09/2014 15:29, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
> Hi! It is getting somewhere, but not quite there yet, it seems. I can
> now make a package, but when I try to install it (no matter which one) I
> get some error messages about the package file:
> 1. Missing meta data
> 2. Invalid or corrupt package
Den 18. sep. 2014 17:16, skrev Benoît Minisini:
> Le 17/09/2014 10:12, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>> Den 17. sep. 2014 03:41, skrev Benoît Minisini:
>>> Le 16/09/2014 17:19, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
It really doesn't matter what project you use, as all of them fail the
same way. I h
Go to the source folder and run "ls -a -l".
Jussi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Jørn Erik Mørne
wrote:
> >Salut Jørn Erik,
>
> Hei på deg Charlie :)
>
> >what I see is Permission denied seams to be a Permission problem.
>
> >No, these say "Permission denied" (a lot!). Something with your
>Salut Jørn Erik,
Hei på deg Charlie :)
>what I see is Permission denied seams to be a Permission problem.
>No, these say "Permission denied" (a lot!). Something with your source tree
>is not OK anymore. Did you build as root last time? The first two lines also
>suggest that you moved the tree
Like others have already said, it seems to be permission problem. Maybe by
using sudo in wrong place..?
I suggest to delete your source folder and checkout again. Should be the
easiest way.
Jussi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jørn Erik Mørne
wrote:
>
> Den 18. sep. 2014 17:16, skrev Benoît
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, J??rn Erik M??rne wrote:
>
> Den 18. sep. 2014 17:16, skrev Beno??t Minisini:
> > Le 17/09/2014 10:12, J??rn Erik M??rne a ??crit :
> >> Den 17. sep. 2014 03:41, skrev Beno??t Minisini:
> >>> Le 16/09/2014 17:19, J??rn Erik M??rne a ??crit :
>
> It really doesn't mat
Am Freitag, den 19.09.2014, 08:51 +0200 schrieb Jørn Erik Mørne:
> Den 18. sep. 2014 17:16, skrev Benoît Minisini:
> > Le 17/09/2014 10:12, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
> >> Den 17. sep. 2014 03:41, skrev Benoît Minisini:
> >>> Le 16/09/2014 17:19, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>
> It really doe
Den 18. sep. 2014 17:16, skrev Benoît Minisini:
> Le 17/09/2014 10:12, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>> Den 17. sep. 2014 03:41, skrev Benoît Minisini:
>>> Le 16/09/2014 17:19, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
It really doesn't matter what project you use, as all of them fail the
same way. I h
Le 17/09/2014 10:12, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
> Den 17. sep. 2014 03:41, skrev Benoît Minisini:
>> Le 16/09/2014 17:19, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>>>
>>> It really doesn't matter what project you use, as all of them fail the
>>> same way. I had Manjaro on two different PCs and the result was the s
Le 13/09/2014 23:47, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>
> Den 13. sep. 2014 23:41, skrev Benoît Minisini:
>> Le 13/09/2014 23:28, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>>> If I may add one more issue - hope I am not flooding here now, but this
>>> one has been around since day one. On Manjaro, making installation
>>>
Den 13. sep. 2014 23:41, skrev Benoît Minisini:
> Le 13/09/2014 23:28, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
>> If I may add one more issue - hope I am not flooding here now, but this
>> one has been around since day one. On Manjaro, making installation
>> packages fail...
>>
>> ==
Le 13/09/2014 23:28, Jørn Erik Mørne a écrit :
> If I may add one more issue - hope I am not flooding here now, but this
> one has been around since day one. On Manjaro, making installation
> packages fail...
>
>
>
> Saving CHANGELOG file.
>
> ==
If I may add one more issue - hope I am not flooding here now, but this
one has been around since day one. On Manjaro, making installation
packages fail...
Saving CHANGELOG file.
Creating package for Archlinux.
Hi Wally,
Colour me curious too. I just checked my package manager to see if
these "migration" tools are available and the answer is no; not for
Mageia at any rate.
I did see that my "Make Installation package" Gambas wizard indicates
"makepkg" is needed for Archlinux and only "debhelper" for Debia
On Sunday 05 August 2012 20:09:49 RICHARD WALKER wrote:
> Wally,
> You have made me curious. I always thought that OpenSuse used RPM type
> packages. Is it the case that you are building for an alien (to
> OpenSuse) distribution?
>
> Richard
Richard,
yes, Open Suse is rpm based.
I also was curi
Wally,
You have made me curious. I always thought that OpenSuse used RPM type
packages. Is it the case that you are building for an alien (to
OpenSuse) distribution?
Richard
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive l
i want to try to "Make Installation Package" on
GB3 V 3.2.90 on OpenSuse 12.1
"makepkg" is missing
Package.MakeDebPackage.767: 'dpkg-buildpackage' has failed.
where to find mor info on this feature and its needs ?
wally
---
2009/11/11 charlesg :
>
> The package on Ubuntu is annoyingly incomplete. Go into Synaptic, search on
> Gambas and install the rest of what should have been in the package.
>
> Even better compile Gambas from source although 2.13 is fine for testing.
>
> rgds
this is not the problem ... the depend
The package on Ubuntu is annoyingly incomplete. Go into Synaptic, search on
Gambas and install the rest of what should have been in the package.
Even better compile Gambas from source although 2.13 is fine for testing.
rgds
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Make-Installati
Good Morning:
Not sure whether this is a bug or I have failed to do something
correctly. If there is an link to solve this problem please forgive me
and direct me to the appropriate link. - thanks
I am using Gambas 2.13 on Ubuntu 9.10
As an investigation project to Gambas' viability, I built a
Il giovedì 1 ottobre 2009 15:19:44 Jarkko Härmä ha scritto:
> Moi .
>
> If i do that, i get an error : tar 1.13 not installed. Ok i have tar
> 1.19 but why a specific
> version of tar ??
>
> -Jarkko
>
Tar 1.13 is needed by Slackware packages manager. It means
that i you use a different version of
Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Benoît Minisini wrote:
>>
Moi .
>>> ???
>>>
>>>
If i do that, i get an error : tar 1.13 not installed. Ok i have tar
1.19 but why a specific
version of tar ??
-Jarkko
>>> Because Slackware requires that!
> Benoît Minisini wrote:
> >> Moi .
> >
> > ???
> >
> >> If i do that, i get an error : tar 1.13 not installed. Ok i have tar
> >> 1.19 but why a specific
> >> version of tar ??
> >>
> >> -Jarkko
> >
> > Because Slackware requires that! But apparently it changed in the last
> > version of Slackware
Benoît Minisini wrote:
>> Moi .
>>
>
> ???
>
>
>> If i do that, i get an error : tar 1.13 not installed. Ok i have tar
>> 1.19 but why a specific
>> version of tar ??
>>
>> -Jarkko
>>
>>
>
> Because Slackware requires that! But apparently it changed in the last
> version
> of Slackwa
> Moi .
???
>
> If i do that, i get an error : tar 1.13 not installed. Ok i have tar
> 1.19 but why a specific
> version of tar ??
>
> -Jarkko
>
Because Slackware requires that! But apparently it changed in the last version
of Slackware, but I didn't update Gambas yet.
I'm not a Slackware u
Moi .
If i do that, i get an error : tar 1.13 not installed. Ok i have tar
1.19 but why a specific
version of tar ??
-Jarkko
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer ev
30 matches
Mail list logo