M0E Lnx a écrit :
> Definitely NX
>
> I've tested X over ssh, vnc, X11vnc and none of them compare to the
> speed and quality of NX
> I do all of my gambas developent over a NX environment.
> My host box is in SLC, Utah, and I'm sitting @ a desk in Stafford, TX.
>
> Response is perfect...No netwo
Hi JY,
I'm using FreeNX in Ubuntu64 to deploy my gambas2 apps in windows
enviroments.
I've no problems yet to connect form both (lan and from wan - using ADSL
connections with 20 simultaneus users). The ubuntu server I usually
recommend to my customer are Intel Quad Core with 4 Gb RAM at least.
Nick Rathke a écrit :
> LOL!
>
> Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
...
>> Nobody's perfect ;-)
>> (nice and quiet city; well, as far as there's no gas leak from Dugway and no
>> wind)
hehe
Even if your howto is based upon the non-free version (I use the FreeNX svr) it
helped me:
the beast is now talk
LOL!
Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
> Nick Rathke a écrit :
>
>> Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
>>
>>> M0E Lnx a écrit :
>>>
>>>
Definitely NX
I've tested X over ssh, vnc, X11vnc and none of them compare to the
speed and quality of NX
I do all of my gambas deve
Nick Rathke a écrit :
> Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
>> M0E Lnx a écrit :
>>
>>> Definitely NX
>>>
>>> I've tested X over ssh, vnc, X11vnc and none of them compare to the
>>> speed and quality of NX
>>> I do all of my gambas developent over a NX environment.
>>> My host box is in SLC, Utah, and I
Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
> M0E Lnx a écrit :
>
>> Definitely NX
>>
>> I've tested X over ssh, vnc, X11vnc and none of them compare to the
>> speed and quality of NX
>> I do all of my gambas developent over a NX environment.
>> My host box is in SLC, Utah, and I'm sitting @ a desk in Stafford,
M0E Lnx a écrit :
> Definitely NX
>
> I've tested X over ssh, vnc, X11vnc and none of them compare to the
> speed and quality of NX
> I do all of my gambas developent over a NX environment.
> My host box is in SLC, Utah, and I'm sitting @ a desk in Stafford, TX.
so I suppose there's a book of Mor
Definitely NX
I've tested X over ssh, vnc, X11vnc and none of them compare to the
speed and quality of NX
I do all of my gambas developent over a NX environment.
My host box is in SLC, Utah, and I'm sitting @ a desk in Stafford, TX.
Response is perfect...No network lag (unless I'm downloading som
Ron_1st a écrit :
>
> I did use NX a few years back and vnc on a w98 bax to do some gambas
> development on a linux box.
> For the feel NX was more quick as vnc, I did not check it out to numbers.
Yeah, I'll test also for that (but its more by feeling, except if speed
differences
are very
On Thursday 30 July 2009, Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I wanna make instant flow & data quantity measures in order to determine what
> remote X access solution is the best solution (speed/quality/instant flow...)
> to access a Gambas application from w$ (or Linux) through tunnelised
Benoît Minisini a écrit :
...
>> The goal is to find out good and reliable solutions for LAN and Internet
>> remote access, as I did not found such tests on the WEB (ie: NX claims it's
>> the best speed/instant flow... but as a matter of fact nobody's ever
>> validate/unvalidate such an assertion b
> Hi folks,
>
> I wanna make instant flow & data quantity measures in order to determine
> what remote X access solution is the best solution (speed/quality/instant
> flow...) to access a Gambas application from w$ (or Linux) through
> tunnelised XDMCP, Xephyr, OpenVpn, ssh -X, FreeNX, ...
>
> To m
Hi folks,
I wanna make instant flow & data quantity measures in order to determine what
remote X access solution is the best solution (speed/quality/instant flow...)
to access a Gambas application from w$ (or Linux) through tunnelised XDMCP,
Xephyr, OpenVpn, ssh -X, FreeNX, ...
To make sure test
13 matches
Mail list logo
