Re: [Gambas-user] Bug in IDE packager for rpm packages

2015-05-06 Thread Willy@develop
On wo, 2015-05-06 at 08:26 +0200, Ron wrote: > Indeed hard to find official documentation about this subject. > > I have found this though: > > "Package names (both source and binary, see Package, Section 5.6.7) > must consist only of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9), plus (+) > and minus (

Re: [Gambas-user] Bug in IDE packager for rpm packages

2015-05-05 Thread Ron
Indeed hard to find official documentation about this subject. I have found this though: "Package names (both source and binary, see Package, Section 5.6.7) must consist only of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9), plus (+) and minus (-) signs, and periods (.). They must be at least two charac

Re: [Gambas-user] Bug in IDE packager for rpm packages

2015-05-05 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 05/05/2015 23:28, Willy@develop a écrit : > Hi, > > A user on the Gambas forum reported having trouble making rpm packages > using IDE. > > We had some discussion on the topic to check if all requirements where > installed to build rpm packages on Ubuntu. They where but when making > packages fo