On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> >Without that buffer, it is brain-fucking:
>
> No, I can live with that solution.. :-)
>
> It was using a pointer as a stream that I missed ..
>
> Many thanks,
> Gareth.
>
I have implemented a buffered UdpSocket in the revision #1669 of Gambas 3. If
t;
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November, 2008 3:51:14 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] Problem with READ on a UDP socket
On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Erm, Ok .. I was expecting a buffer layer between socket library and Gambas
> .. but that asid
On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Erm, Ok .. I was expecting a buffer layer between socket library and Gambas
> .. but that aside, If I'm expecting a binary packet via a UDP socket, for
> example;
>
> - 1 byte
> - 4 bytes
> - 2 bytes
> - up to 1024, dictated by
>
> Can anyone tell
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mailing list for gambas users"
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November, 2008 2:35:21 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] Problem with READ on a UDP socket
On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I repor
ize: Consider adding `-I m4' to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am.
configure.ac:69: required file `./config.guess' not found
configure.ac:69: `automake --add-missing' can install `config.guess'
configure.ac:69: required file `./config.sub' not found
configure.ac:69: `automa
Benoit Minisini wrote:
> On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I reported this quite a while ago but it still seems to be a
>> problem ... using READ to try to acquire less than the entire available
>> buffer doesn't seem to work .. and if I read the entire buffer,
On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I reported this quite a while ago but it still seems to be a
> problem ... using READ to try to acquire less than the entire available
> buffer doesn't seem to work .. and if I read the entire buffer, there's no
> obvious way to break t
On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Benoit Minisini wrote:
> On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I reported this quite a while ago but it still seems to be a
> > problem ... using READ to try to acquire less than the entire available
> > buffer doesn't seem to work .. and if
On mardi 4 novembre 2008, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I reported this quite a while ago but it still seems to be a
> problem ... using READ to try to acquire less than the entire available
> buffer doesn't seem to work .. and if I read the entire buffer, there's no
> obvious way to break t
