On Friday, 7 June 2019 05:08:37 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 02:24, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:15:04 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 01:54, Christian Gagneraud
wrote:
> > > > When
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:15:04 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 01:54, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > When programmatically using remote models to build my graphs, i have
> > to deal with a very annoying "feature": the lazy loading.
> >
> > The problem is that i need to
On Wednesday, 5 June 2019 00:04:26 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> Is there any special requirement for client/server code about namespacing?
> I would like to use a sub-namespace for my plugin. But it seems that
> no code does that.
> Is it allowed/desirable?
I don't think there is any requirem
On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 16:10:37 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 02:50, Volker Krause wrote:
> > In general, not having to maintain visualization components as part of
> > GammaRay would IMHO be preferable, but if we need something that isn't
&
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 08:48:37 CEST Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Friday, 24 May 2019 08:20:58 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 05:34, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > > At some point you need to bite the bullet and just write code for one
> > > use-
> > > case; I've tried the too-generi
On Friday, 10 May 2019 13:53:40 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> [some old draft emails, sorry if it doesn't make sense]
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 23:09, Volker Krause wrote:
> > > > The signal history model is already quite expensive, you certainly
> > > &g
On Friday, 10 May 2019 13:55:45 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> [another old draft email, sending it in the hope to bring the discussion
> back]
>
> Hi,
>
> Starting a new thread.
>
> As i started coding, i'm slowly realising that the signal history
> model might not be the right tool to work
to load the plugins...
Regards,
Volker
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 20:37, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 06:14:38 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 02:49, Volker Krause
wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > >
On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 06:14:38 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 02:49, Volker Krause wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > that sounds like missing (or incompatible) tool plugins, either on the
> > target side (and thus really only the built-in tools existin
Hi,
that sounds like missing (or incompatible) tool plugins, either on the target
side (and thus really only the built-in tools existing), or on the host side
so that the tools exist on target but there is just no UI for them.
Other reasons like issues with the build configuration as you mentio
Hi,
GammaRay on QNX should work, and ARM64 also works, the combination however is
untested.
Regarding "raw" injection with LD_PRELOAD, while not officially intended that
way, it mostly works in practice. The main problem is getting settings to the
probe, as the usual channel for that isn't ava
On Saturday, 23 March 2019 15:39:54 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 09:41, Volker Krause wrote:
> > > IMHO, some models should contains these dynamic data in a more
> > > processed way, eg AbstractConnectionsModel contains static data, while
>
On Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:29:53 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 10:43, Volker Krause wrote:
> > > Second:
> > > Wouldn't it be nice to run the problem scanner in an automated way?
> > > The idea would be to use gammaray as an automate
Hi,
On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 17:59:24 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> A few quick random thoughts, sorry for the "dump" style.
>
> First thing first:
> Have you seen the PR "ObjectInspector: Add thread affinity checker"
> (https://github.com/KDAB/GammaRay/pull/538/)?
> What do you think? Do yo
On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 17:38:50 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 09:23, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Friday, 1 March 2019 03:14:45 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > > We ran into a tricky problem at run-time (embedded Linux).
> > > The app i w
Hi,
On Friday, 1 March 2019 03:14:45 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> We ran into a tricky problem at run-time (embedded Linux).
> The app i want to introspect has Linux capabilities bits set. This
> put ld.so in a `secure-execution` mode.
> For the preload to work, we need to meet these 3 condit
On Sunday, 24 June 2018 08:01:30 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> It took me a while to find out what the problem was, so here it is:
> My query engine would dead-lock if i create a QXmlQuery or a
> QXmlFormatter, while holding the probe's lock.
> Is it something unexpected or does
On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 06:17:25 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 19 June 2018 at 11:46, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > On 18 June 2018 at 19:50, Volker Krause wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 17 June 2018 04:31:53 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> >>> On 15 June 2018
Very cool!
On Monday, 18 June 2018 05:07:00 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Quick email to report about my week-end experiments/gross hacks.
>
> I created 2 classes:
> - ObjectQueryEngine
> - ObjectXmlNodeModel (derived from QSimpleXmlNodeModel)
>
> The ObjectQueryEngine as a
On Sunday, 17 June 2018 04:31:53 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 15 June 2018 at 23:07, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Friday, 15 June 2018 05:12:53 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> >> On 14 June 2018 at 03:47, Volker Krause wrote:
> >> The object query engine w
Hi Christian,
thanks for the feedback.
Regarding Squish, we use that a lot too, and conceptually GammaRay and Squish
indeed work very similarly when interacting with the application under test,
using the same introspection and tracking mechanisms etc.
So technically it's of course conceivable
Hi,
thanks for the feedback!
Yes, I've encountered the problem with property reads having side-effects too
(it's even worse in some of the lower-level GL classes where you crash the
target if there is no active GL context).
There's probably two ways to address this, all out hiding the propert
On Thursday 09 July 2015 12:46:06 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Thursday, July 09, 2015 05:31:35 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2015 11:36:21 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > Volker and Kevin think we need a stable version that builds w
e to review if I forgot something.
Thanks!
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:47:44 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:11:47 PM René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > On Thursday May 28 2015 11:14:54 Volker Krause wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Yep, GAMMARAY_PROBE_ONLY_BUILD.
> >
> > That
On Thursday 28 May 2015 11:05:34 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday May 28 2015 09:34:18 Volker Krause wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks for answering.
>
> >Yep, I would guess the CLI (lower-case) binary could just be dropped from
> >the bundle.
>
> For MacPorts it'd
is needed prior to Qt 5.4, with
5.4 we can use the much superior (faster and more complete coverage) preload
injector.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. +49-30-521325470
KDAB - Th
of larger pending changes or missing important fixes, so no
blocker from that side.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts
et me know if want to delay 2.1.1 for any reason.
thanks for driving this again Allen! All good to go from my side, I've just
pushed two more small fixes to make things work with Qt 5.4 as well.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deuts
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 10:23:13 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 04:01:06 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks Allen for driving this again!
> >
> > On Tuesday 03 June 2014 08:53:00 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > Volker and I woul
e 27th looks good to me.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
sm
toolchain file for this, I was unable to get it
working properly without that.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts
tibility with Qt4.7
> * Avoid leaking shared-memory in case of crashes of gammaray-client
> * Fix various crashes
> * Fix various crashes with heavily multithreaded debuggees
>
> Greets
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&
y documented so far.
I've started a wiki page for this here:
https://github.com/KDAB/GammaRay/wiki/Developing-GammaRay
Still very basic, but it should contain the key points for debugging both the
probe and the client, at least on Unix.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kd
> Robert Schimkowitsch
> Automation
> Development Control Center Systems
> ANDRITZ HYDRO GmbH
> Eibesbrunnergasse 20
> 1120 Vienna, Austria
> Phone: +43 50805 56767
> e-mail: robert.schimkowit...@andritz.com
> Internet: www.andritz-hydro.com
>
>
> -Original Me
ing of this email
> and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
> in error, please contact the sender and delete the message and any
> attachment from your system.
>
> Thank You.
>
>
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra.
upport for Clang-
only platforms like Mac OS X 10.9 lined up for 2.0.1.
Thanks for driving this again Allen!
Regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (H
On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:26:53 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 23.01.2014 10:05, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 17:52:26 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Is 2.0 now ready for remote debugging from desktop to embedded ARM
> >> systems?
> >
> > y
s works between Qt
versions, between operating systems and between architectures. We have tested
various combinations, but I think we had a strong bias towards little endian
systems.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&a
' :
> return code
> '0x2'
> Stop.
>
> I simple removed this:
>
> #if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(Q_OS_ANDROID) // only MSVC and Android
> don't have log2()...
> static double log2(double n)
> {
> return log(n) / log(2.0f);
> }
> #endif
&
On Monday 23 September 2013 15:03:14 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday, September 23, 2013 03:27:26 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 16:12:34 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > I'd like to get a 1.3.2 release out the door sometime so
have by now all 24 tools adapted to the new infrastructure, most of them
actually work fine remotely even (see status page in the wiki), there are
still some bits that need work though. We should have a working preview for
QtDD in Berlin, but I don't think that's ready for a large-
.1 release.
> Do we need one?
>
> There have been 0 commits into the 1.3 branch since the last tag.
> So I'm guessing the answer is "no".
>
> But thought I'd ask anyway.
> Let me know your thoughts on this.
>
> -Allen
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab
to the 1.3 branch as well, and have slightly larger 1.3.x releases
until 2.0 is ready.
regards,
Volker
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt
lendar says that we planned to release GammaRay 1.3.0 on 22 Jan (in 5
> days)
>
> Please let me know if you need more time: the release date is flexible.
>
> Also let me know about new features we should publicize.
>
> -Allen
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Se
orward now that the role list is no longer hardcoded.
regards,
Volker
On Monday 17 December 2012 10:40:11 Ian Monroe wrote:
> How do I introspect user-defined roles in QAbstractItemModel's? Is it
> possible? setRoleNames doesn't seem to be enough.
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@
t; Comments? Objections?
> Are there bugs we need to fix in the meantime?
>
> -Allen
--
Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts -
47 matches
Mail list logo
