On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:36:09AM +0200, Leif Nixon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> *However*, it turns out glibc already does this!
>
> sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) should work on x86, sparc, alpha, mips
> and, probably, ia64.
>
Good tip, thanks! Much easier than doing it the hard way.
glibc e
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:40:07PM -0700, matt massie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> QUESTION:
>
> should i remove all the autoconf, automake, libtool derived files and
> require that we run...
>
> # aclocal
> # autoheader
> # automake
> # autoconf
>
> before we run
>
> # ./configure
>
> on th
Yesterday, Jason A. Smith wrote forth saying...
> I have a few questions about ganglia development. I am using ganglia on
> RedHat 7.x i386 here.
>
> 1. I tried the new network metrics that are in the latest cvs version
> of the monitoring-core module and was wondering what happens on a dual
>
Yesterday, Federico Sacerdoti wrote forth saying...
> The LOCATION attribute in the HOST tag specifies where the host is
> physically located in the cluster - Rack, Rank, and Plane. These are
> specified in a 3D euclidean coordinate "x,y,z". This attribute enables
> technicians (or more probabl
leif-
that's a great tip! it looks like it works on cygwin and we had problems
with calling the number of CPUs on cygwin (well i guess i should say
matt rice was having problems since i'm still scratching my head amazed he
ported ganglia to cygwin in the first place).
thanks!
-matt
Today,
matt massie wrote:
guys-
let's talk.
if( you know about autoconf, automake and libtool)
goto QUESTION:
If only I could forget...
QUESTION:
should i remove all the autoconf, automake, libtool derived files and
require that we run...
# aclocal
# autoheader
# automake
# autoconf
befo
guys-
let's talk.
if( you know about autoconf, automake and libtool)
goto QUESTION:
autoconf uses the file configure.in to create the configure script.
configure.in just contains some a list of macro tests you want added to
./configure. autoconf parses this file and creates a single bour
i just checked in a new tcp.c.. in tcp_listen() i wasn't checking the
return value of setsockopt() on one option. oops.
-matt
Leif Nixon wrote:
Preston Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:11:34PM +0200, Leif Nixon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A tentative fix would be to instead count the number of lines
starting with "processor" in /proc/cpuinfo.
There's been a bug filed about
Preston Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:11:34PM +0200, Leif Nixon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > A tentative fix would be to instead count the number of lines
> > starting with "processor" in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> There's been a bug filed about this exact issue on
10 matches
Mail list logo
