Martin,
I like you idea and think you did the right thing. Brooks, if you want
to indicate "always zero" set the slope of the metric to "zero". The
webfrontend will interpret that correctly.
Martin, let me know if you would like the webfrontend changed, and how.
I can update the CPU report fa
i just put up a new 2.6.0 @ http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/
the old version had a typo in inet_ntop.c that was messing up the
inet_ntop() on solaris. i tested this newest snapshot on
SunOS white 5.7 Generic_106541-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
with
address mySolarisBox
port
action send_re
yemi et al.
i'll have a fix for the 0.0.0.0 host problem very soon. i've traced it
down to inet_ntop madness on solaris. more details soon.
-matt
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 16:44, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> --- "Adesanya, Adeyemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there.
> >
> > I took Matts l
--- "Adesanya, Adeyemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there.
>
> I took Matts latest 2.6.0 snapshot from
> http://www.matt-massie.com/ganglia . Applied Martin's patch file
> containing Michael's kstat_lookup fix to solaris.c and then built on
Michael's stuff is now in CVS, btw.
> RedHat En
> OK, this makes sense, though I'm not 100% happy with it. It would be
> nice if we could report a value that indicated "always zero" so the
> interface could not display it where appropriate in that case. I
> wonder
> what, if anything, would break if we returned -0.0.
>
what would be nice is
Hi there.
I took Matts latest 2.6.0 snapshot from http://www.matt-massie.com/ganglia .
Applied Martin's patch file containing Michael's kstat_lookup fix to solaris.c
and then built on RedHat Enterprise 3.0 (2.4 kernel) , Solaris 5.8 and Solaris
5.9 without a hitch. Note that on both Solaris pla
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:03:38AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
> --- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:03:28AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing
> > the
> > > addition
--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:03:28AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing
> the
> > addition of cpu_wio as a global metric :-) I just went ahead and
> did
> > it.
>
> Arg, app
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:03:28AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing the
> addition of cpu_wio as a global metric :-) I just went ahead and did
> it.
Arg, apparently I should have read my mail more carefully. What is WIO
Hi,
after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing the
addition of cpu_wio as a global metric :-) I just went ahead and did
it.
All platforms now report cpu_wio to the data stream. Those platforms
that do not have the category just report "0".
Today the following platforms
10 matches
Mail list logo
