Hi guys:
On 9/10/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is really the question. I am simply making an assumption without any
> way to test it. I would ask those that have access to Max OSX, to apply this
> patch and test it before we commit it to 3.0.5 or trunk.
The following sn
>>> On 9/10/2007 at 3:22 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI Brad:
>
> On 9/10/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>But I do have one question regarding the 3.0.5 POLLHUP patch. It looks
> like the real problem with the code is that o
HI Brad:
On 9/10/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But I do have one question regarding the 3.0.5 POLLHUP patch. It looks
> like the real problem with the code is that on an EOF, POLLIN and POLLHUP are
> actually received together. Therefore, the code in data_thread.c would go
>>> On 9/6/2007 at 12:22 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On 8/24/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I haven't looked at this code yet, but it sounds like something that should
> be using the APR API's rather than native AP
I noticed that while gmetad and gmond can be set to drop their uid
values to a non-privileged user (like "nobody"), they do not drop the
gid values. Was this an intentional design decision? If not, I think
it would be a good idea to drop the gid as well.
A simple way to do this without having t
