Hi Brad:
On 9/19/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that you are going to have to re-roll the test tarball. I just
> fixed a typo in the data_thread.c file that was causing the POLLHUP code to
> be commented out rather than #ifdef'd for DARWIN. Testing on OSX would hav
Bernard,
I think that you are going to have to re-roll the test tarball. I just
fixed a typo in the data_thread.c file that was causing the POLLHUP code to be
commented out rather than #ifdef'd for DARWIN. Testing on OSX would have
produced the expected results, but other platforms might h
Hi Mike:
The following RC is generated from the code in branch (which has your
patch checked in already). Can you please test it and confirm that it
does work fine with x86/ppc Mac OSX?
http://www.therealms.org/oss/ganglia/testing/
Jason, are you still up for releasing a dmg or tarball for Mac
>>> On 9/19/2007 at 11:01 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Wow, this is the scenario that I was afraid of. I am by no means an expert
> in this area, but this seems broken on OSX. In this case
Hi Brad:
On 9/19/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I had previously checked my patch into trunk. So my patch will have to
> be reverted and Mike's checked in.
If you can revert the patch, I'll take care of checking in the changes
into trunk and merging it to branch when it is
On 9/19/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, this is the scenario that I was afraid of. I am by no means an expert
> in this area, but this seems broken on OSX. In this case you are correct,
> POLLHUP really means nothing. Your original patch is probably the way to go.
All rig
>>> On 9/18/2007 at 10:02 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only speaking for what is happening on OSX.
>
> The original issue (before the patches):
> After reading all the data from the for(;;) loop, we would read a
> SYS_CALL buffer, determine that PO
