Re: [Ganglia-developers] Lets discuss the wish-list and make 3.1.0 happen (was:Re: [Ganglia-general] 4T limit on memory?)

2007-10-30 Thread Matt Massie
On 10/30/07, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matt mentioned that GroundWork Open Source has some monies that could > be used to fly some developers to the Bay Area and host a meetup -- I > wonder if that offer is still on the plate (Matt?) -- as far as i know, the offer still stands.

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Lets discuss the wish-list and make 3.1.0 happen (was:Re: [Ganglia-general] 4T limit on memory?)

2007-10-30 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Brad: On 10/30/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't looked at the 4T issue close enough to know whether it is just a > metric problem or a core gmond problem (or both). When I say 'core', I am > referring to gmond itself which does not include metric.c. I consider > me

[Ganglia-developers] Lets discuss the wish-list and make 3.1.0 happen (was:Re: [Ganglia-general] 4T limit on memory?)

2007-10-30 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 10/30/2007 at 9:55 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brad: > > On 10/30/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Going forward (3.1.x) -- how should this be fixed? >> > >> > P.S. I currently have no plans to accept any patches into

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 4T limit on memory?

2007-10-30 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Brad: On 10/30/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Going forward (3.1.x) -- how should this be fixed? > > > > P.S. I currently have no plans to accept any patches into the 3.0.x > > branch (unless of course if the community wants it) -- all new stuff > > should go into trunk (i.e.

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 4T limit on memory?

2007-10-30 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 10/29/2007 at 4:43 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Chris, Brad: > > (Forwarding to ganglia-developers) > > Going forward (3.1.x) -- how should this be fixed? > > P.S. I currently have no plans to accept any patches into the 3.0.x > branch (