>>> On 4/17/2008 at 4:10 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Are we ready to produce a beta from the 3.1 branch? I think it would be
> good to try to roll a
Hi Brad:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we ready to produce a beta from the 3.1 branch? I think it would be
> good to try to roll a 3.1.0. beta tarball out and announce that it is
> ready for testing. If testing goes well, then we shoul
Bernard,
Are we ready to produce a beta from the 3.1 branch? I think it would be
good to try to roll a 3.1.0. beta tarball out and announce that it is ready
for testing. If testing goes well, then we should push a 3.1.1 release
candidate out soonish.
Brad
>>> On 4/15/2008 at 5:35 PM,
Witham, Timothy D wrote:
>> Please have a look at this patch, perhaps it'll help with your
> endeavor:
>> http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176
>
It does look interesting.
> I really like that patch too. :-)
>
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Rich Paul <[EMAIL PROT
Hi Carlo:
I'm not sure if the following two check-ins you've made are necessary?
http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ganglia?view=rev&revision=1226
http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ganglia?view=rev&revision=1227
Since in r1200 I have already removed the logo and the date from the
Jim,
If you don't mind I'll roll this patch back into my experimental 3.0
tree packages as finding time to learn enough apr to fix this has been
my showstopper for months.
Thanks,
Stu
--
>From the prompt of Stu Teasdale
Barth's Distinction:
There are two types of people: those who di
