[Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.8 snapshot available

2008-06-04 Thread Bernard Li
Dear all: I decided to build a snapshot of the latest from the 3.0.x branch. This will ultimately become 3.0.8. Please test and report any issues to the ganglia-developers mailing-list. The snapshot can be found here: http://www.ganglia.info/snapshots/3.0.x/ Thanks, Bernard -

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec, gexec-authd, libe

2008-06-04 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Erich: On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have some RPMs labeled 0.3.8-4 around (don't see it in oscar-svn but > in oscar-pro), so 0.3.9 makes sense. Okay I'll release that as 0.3.9 then -- if you can spare a moment, I would appreciate it if you could t

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec, gexec-authd, libe

2008-06-04 Thread Erich Focht
Hi Bernard, I have some RPMs labeled 0.3.8-4 around (don't see it in oscar-svn but in oscar-pro), so 0.3.9 makes sense. Thanks! Best regards, Erich On Mittwoch 04 Juni 2008, Bernard Li wrote: > Hey Erich: > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > sorry f

Re: [Ganglia-developers] First Ganglia 3.1.x snapshot available

2008-06-04 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Carlo: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if generated with a version of automake older than 1.8.3, of course. > > Bernard, my CentOS 4.6 test build system seems to have the right version of > automake installed by default and generate val

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Moving gexec related structs fromganglia_priv.h to ganglia.h

2008-06-04 Thread Bernard Li
Hi all: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a good idea, I'll see what I can come up with. I have checked in my changes to trunk: http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ganglia?view=rev&revision=1380 I have also updated the STATUS file with a bac

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec, gexec-authd, libe

2008-06-04 Thread Bernard Li
Hey Erich: On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sorry for the late reply. From what I remember I tried gexec & co with > one of the 3.0.* ganglias. I don't have time to really care now, but > yes, if you want to release the current state, please do it. Okay I

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec, gexec-authd, libe

2008-06-04 Thread Erich Focht
Hey Bernard! sorry for the late reply. From what I remember I tried gexec & co with one of the 3.0.* ganglias. I don't have time to really care now, but yes, if you want to release the current state, please do it. Regards, Erich On Freitag 30 Mai 2008, Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Erich: > > Do you c