>From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I am not asking about why 1 patch was provided (which I agree is really >useful >for testing) but on why the STATUS change doesn't instead list all patches >that are needed (at least from my initial merge attempts based on your >instructions I think 1847 is missing) The proposal did accidentally miss changes to metric.php and sample_report.php. I believe the full backport should be: svn merge -c 1844 -c 1847 -c 1848 -c 1850 -c 1855 -c 1856 -c 1857 ../trunk/monitor-core ./ I skipped 1869 because it makes that % look different than the others. I'm voting for it after these slight tweaks. Related to this: Jesse and I were talking about "now" vs. the new "last" on the metric graphs. I had left now as-is so we could compare it to last. They are usually redundant, and possibly confusing. Now is current data from the XML which is beyond the right end of the graph. Last is the last averaged data point actually in the graph. It seems like last is more intuitive since it comes from the displayed data source, while now is more confusing since it comes from another data source (the XML that has not yet averaged in to the graph). Should now be removed from the metric graphs? Comments? -twitham ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
