Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] ganglia using ports < 1024?

On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: [Moved to the dev list] On 3/22/2010 at 7:49 AM, in message , Winnie Lacesso wrote: Dear All, I'm new to ganglia, but it looks wonderful. Platform is Scientific Linux 4 & 5. Due to no firewall > 1024 it might be more prudent for ganglia

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] ganglia using ports < 1024?

[Moved to the dev list] >>> On 3/22/2010 at 7:49 AM, in message , Winnie Lacesso wrote: > Dear All, > > I'm new to ganglia, but it looks wonderful. > Platform is Scientific Linux 4 & 5. > Due to no firewall > 1024 it might be more prudent for ganglia to use > ports < 1024 - I'm nervous to have

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmond fails with "apr_pollset_create failed: Invalid argument" when no udp_recv_channels or tcp_accept_channels are defined

>>> On 3/19/2010 at 4:03 PM, in message , Bernard Li wrote: > Dear all: > > Looks like we have a bug in setup_listen_channels_pollset() in gmond.c. > > If your gmond.conf has no udp_recv_channel or tcp_accept_channel > defined, gmond will fail to run with the error message: > > apr_pollset_crea