Hi Carlo: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <care...@sajinet.com.pe> wrote:
> bug is invalid, as it is the result of not indicating the right paths > to use for the dependencies, if installing them through ports. > > the proposed fix will only remove the "WARNING" from configure, which > is just a red herring since the code has all dependendant headers defined > correctly regardless of the results from configure but if you really want > to commit it, it wouldn't most likely do harm either. Initially I thought configure actually bailed with the warnings, however, checking with the user again this does not appear to be the case. So are you saying that if you did ./configure --prefix=/usr/local then the WARNING would not show up? AFAIK that's what the user did too (even though it was not specified in the bug report), so I just wanted to confirm. If the warning still shows up it might be a good idea to check in the code if it doesn't break anything since less warning is good IMHO. Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
