There is really no new infrastructure to deploy. All you need is gmond
3.2.0 on the receiving end and host-sflowd on Windows servers.
As far as reaching out to experts I haven't really seen much interest in
fixing gmond for Windows.
Vladimir
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Im Root wrote:
> I'm not inter
Thanks Jeff.
The pmond setup looks really crude but I'll give it a try and see how it does.
From: Jeff Buchbinder
To: Im Root
Cc: "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net"
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Even MORE
Vlad,
I'm not interested in deploying a completely new infrastructure. I already have
an extensive ganglia setup and can see all my servers except for a growing
number of Win2k8r2 servers. If we can get them to report to ganglia without
locking up the cpu, then the problem is solved.
I posed
Best fixes are provided by users scratching their own itches :-). This is
speaking from my own experience. Perhaps you should take up the challenge
?
As far as Windows is concerned you may be best of use host-sflowd. That is
what I use
http://blog.sflow.com/2010/10/installing-host-sflow-on-win
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Im Root wrote:
> Hey this would be a great to benefit lots of users. Apparently the gmond
> program goes into an indefinite CPU loop on this operating system. (Nobody
> really cares if you make gmond run on zero/MQ pub sub anyways.) In fact this
> would be of more
Hey this would be a great to benefit lots of users. Apparently the gmond
program goes into an indefinite CPU loop on this operating system. (Nobody
really cares if you make gmond run on zero/MQ pub sub anyways.) In fact this
would be of more benefit than writing a ganglia book or putting the cod
