Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec, gexec-authd, libe

2008-06-04 Thread Erich Focht
Hi Bernard, I have some RPMs labeled 0.3.8-4 around (don't see it in oscar-svn but in oscar-pro), so 0.3.9 makes sense. Thanks! Best regards, Erich On Mittwoch 04 Juni 2008, Bernard Li wrote: > Hey Erich: > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec, gexec-authd, libe

2008-06-04 Thread Erich Focht
Hey Bernard! sorry for the late reply. From what I remember I tried gexec & co with one of the 3.0.* ganglias. I don't have time to really care now, but yes, if you want to release the current state, please do it. Regards, Erich On Freitag 30 Mai 2008, Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Erich: > > Do you c

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Compiling Ganglia and Gexec

2007-06-18 Thread Erich Focht
Hello Lauro, sorry for the late answer, I didn't monitor this mailing list too closely in the past weeks. When building gexec (and I mean the stuff in the svn repository at https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ganglia/trunk/gexec ) you need to build not only gexec, but also libe and gexec-authd. S

[Ganglia-developers] cmetricd

2007-05-11 Thread Erich Focht
Hello, I wrote a small daemon which we use currently for making and feeding custom metrics into ganglia in clusters built with OSCAR-Pro. The daemon is called cmetricd and is quite configurable in what it does: - it runs arbitrary programs at arbitrary time intervals, kills them if they don't retu

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Bugzilla and bugs

2006-12-22 Thread Erich Focht
Hi Martin, > your suggestion makes kind of sense, so I would agree to incorporate > this. thanks, done (guess you've seen it in the commits). So what's the plan now for a release? Regards, Erich

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Bugzilla and bugs

2006-12-19 Thread Erich Focht
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:38, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:55:29PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote: > > On Monday 18 December 2006 11:28, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > > > > no objections from my side. I am using it on several cluster

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Bugzilla and bugs

2006-12-18 Thread Erich Focht
Hi all, On Monday 18 December 2006 11:28, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > Hi Bernard, > > no objections from my side. I am using it on several clusters without > any serious problems. any objections to changing the part_max_used metric to be limited to RW partitions? If not, I'd like to check it in b

[Ganglia-developers] part_max_used issue

2006-12-15 Thread Erich Focht
Hi guys, maybe we could fix one issue with part_max_used before releasing 3.0.4. I have systems which are testing the filesystem fill status and alert the admin if they get filled over 90%. Unfortunately if one mounts an ISO the part_max_used value is 100%, which send an unnecessary alarm. So I'd

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec segfault

2006-11-27 Thread Erich Focht
Hi Martin, On Monday 27 November 2006 17:59, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > while the original libe package llist.h is: > > > > typedef struct _llist_entry { > > struct _llist_entry *prev; /* Previous entry on list */ > > struct _llist_entry *next; /* Next entry on list */

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec segfault

2006-11-27 Thread Erich Focht
Hi Martin, On Monday 27 November 2006 12:53, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > > I'd prefer to change this by patching the llist.h of Ganglia. Does > > anybody have objections to this? > > Before fixing things either way, we should take a closer look. Could > you show us the offending difference b

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec segfault

2006-11-25 Thread Erich Focht
also integrated into the ganglia SVN tree: is this now the main development tree for gexec? Thanks, best regards, Erich On Thursday 23 November 2006 13:54, Erich Focht wrote: > Found the problem. The include file lib/llist.h is not compliant to what the > newest libe package (from 2004) is doin

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec segfault

2006-11-23 Thread Erich Focht
. Since ganglia was the one who changed the structure, maybe somebody remembers why this happened. If there was a good reason to do this, we should try to change libe. Otherwise we should probably revert the change in the ganglia tree. Regards, Erich On Thursday 23 November 2006 10:59, Erich Focht

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gexec segfault

2006-11-23 Thread Erich Focht
On Thursday 23 November 2006 03:24, michael chang wrote: > What OS and compiler were used? CentOS4.2 i386, gcc 3.4.4, glibc 2.3.4. Regards, Erich > On 11/22/06, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to run gexec with ganglia-3.0

[Ganglia-developers] gexec segfault

2006-11-22 Thread Erich Focht
Hi, I'm trying to run gexec with ganglia-3.0.3. Built ganglia with --enable-gexec, built and installed gexec. gexec runs fine if executed standalone, but when I try it together with ganglia, gexec segfaults. Does anybody have gexec (version 0.3.6) running with ganglia-3.0.3? Did anything change w

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.1 and java

2005-03-23 Thread Erich Focht
Hello Matt, On Tuesday 15 March 2005 16:23, Matt Massie wrote: > i also have another question for you guys. > > how much do you love/hate java? how would you feel about having gmetad > written in java? > > i only ask because i'm playing around with jrobin > (http://www.jrobin.org/) and it has