Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: 2.6.0? 2.5.8? 3.0.0? (frustration...)

2004-12-14 Thread Josh Durham
Well, I personally think you should continue your development on the next major version. 2.5.x is pretty stable. If someone wants to maintain it, I would think Matt would be glad to let someone support 2.5. I feel that if you spend alot of time maintaining 2.5, or bouncing back between 2.5

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libmetrics oops

2004-09-21 Thread Josh Durham
On Darwin: hc652a119:~/Desktop/libmetrics-200409211005 jdurham$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1640) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILIT

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Gmetad on Mac OS X

2004-08-18 Thread Josh Durham
This is an issue with rrdtool. I think I had to change all the time_value references inside of RRD to rrdtool_time_value. - Josh On Aug 18, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Eric Wages wrote: Hi all. Trying to get Ganglia working for our new mac cluster, but having significant difficulties. Wonder if any

Re: [Ganglia-developers] (no subject)

2004-06-09 Thread Josh Durham
I don't have access to a system right now, but he probably wants: telnet 127.0.0.1 8749 and telnet 8749 I think I remember trying these, and it failing, but I wouldn't bet money on it. - Josh Josh Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer System

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Maybe a trce to the 0.0.0.0 problem on Solaris

2004-06-08 Thread Josh Durham
I think I mentioned this probably on OS X before. No response then. :) I removed all IPV6 addresses from all interfaces, especially the localhost one, and it seemed to work. Not sure what exactly is happening. - Josh On Jun 8, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote: Hi Matt, [please for

Re: [Ganglia-developers] server.c accept() 2.6.0 issue on Darwin

2004-04-14 Thread Josh Durham
Even doing a 'telnet 127.0.0.1 8649' returns 0.0.0.0 as the source address. I just deleted the IPv6 addresses on all the interfaces, and it began working in the normal behavior. Has anyone tried the new ganglia on another system with IPv6 enabled? - Josh On Apr 12, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Jo

[Ganglia-developers] server.c accept() 2.6.0 issue on Darwin

2004-04-12 Thread Josh Durham
don't know how this is impacting things. - Josh Josh Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Systems Engineer P: 540.231.2361 Terascale Computing Facility Virginia Tech

[Ganglia-developers] Getting 2.6.0 Patches

2004-04-09 Thread Josh Durham
Two patches. The first can be easily applied, the second should be tested on another platform. First one allows Ganglia to be compiled if GEXEC_SUPPORTED == 0, and the second fixes a libtool problem with multiple memory_pool symbols declared. Now, I have to figure out why all hosts are comin

[Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 Compiling Errors on Darwin

2004-04-08 Thread Josh Durham
.lo) definition of _memory_pool in section (__DATA,__common) ../libhttpd/.libs/libhttpd.al(httpd_protocol.lo) definition of _memory_pool in section (__DATA,__common) make[2]: *** [libganglia.la] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 Hel

Re: [Ganglia-developers] the multicast chains have been broken

2004-02-26 Thread Josh Durham
explicitly set. excuse me while i go hang my head in shame and quickly alter the code. -matt On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 20:42, Josh Durham wrote: if it's a unicast channel, gmond configures itself a little differently. gmond will send messages on the unicast channel (which will write to a single h

Re: [Ganglia-developers] the multicast chains have been broken

2004-02-26 Thread Josh Durham
if it's a unicast channel, gmond configures itself a little differently. gmond will send messages on the unicast channel (which will write to a single host) but it will NOT listen to unicast messages unless "msg_port" is explicitly set. I may be missing something here, but how do you configure

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Re: Scaling Issues? and Memory Size Problems (combined)

2003-12-31 Thread Josh Durham
Ah ha! You hit the problem on the head. gmetad is assigning a negative value to tn, which is a uint32. This messes up the comparison. So. We can abs() tn when it gets assigned, in process_xml. Or you can make tn and tmax regular int32s. Though another solution is to make sure TN is never ne

[Ganglia-developers] Re: Scaling Issues? and Memory Size Problems (combined)

2003-12-30 Thread Josh Durham
Thanks for your quick response. So, I've been playing around a bit with the TN thing. Here is something interesting.. Here is a larger sample of the output from gmetad: telnet localhost 8651: ... http://blahblah/ganglia/"; LOCALTIME="1072822698"> ... TN="0" TMAX="20" DMAX="0" LOCATION="uns

[Ganglia-developers] Another problem: memory sizes

2003-12-29 Thread Josh Durham
I have another problem. I have 1100 nodes, with 4GB of RAM each. 1100 nodes * 4,194,304 kilobytes of RAM = 4,613,734,400 uint32 max value = 2^32 = 4,294,967,296 I have a feeling, from what I've looked at, that moving all the memory stuff to uint64 is going to be painful. Not t

[Ganglia-developers] Scaling Issues? Some nodes reporting as Down

2003-12-29 Thread Josh Durham
Greetings from Virginia Tech. I'm working on getting Ganglia on our 1100 node G5 cluster, and have had some pretty good success. I do have an issue, and I wonder if it's related to scaling, or the Darwin platform. First, let me describe how I've set everything up so far. All 1100 nodes ar