Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
> Which tarball should I be posting? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05281.html > > The official version - any changes from the unofficial tarball (using a different autotools version to bootstrap) should be aimed at the next release and captured in

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Bernard Li
Vladimir: Is there a particular reason why you're using the 3.1.2 spec file for 3.1.4? We do occasionally make changes to the spec file so using the one that came with the release is the recommended way of building RPMs. Daniel: Which tarball should I be posting? http://www.mail-archive.com/ga

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Vladimir Vuksan wrote: > I used ganglia.spec file I used with 3.1.2 and just changed the > version. I determined that the difference is this > > < %configure --with-gmetad > --- >> %configure --with-gmetad --enable-status --sysconfdir=%{conf_dir} > > That is why I see the problem. If you run con

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
I used ganglia.spec file I used with 3.1.2 and just changed the version. I determined that the difference is this < %configure --with-gmetad --- > %configure --with-gmetad --enable-status --sysconfdir=%{conf_dir} That is why I see the problem. If you run configure without --sysconfdir Makefile

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Vladimir: > > I tested the 3.1.4 RPMs I've built and did not observe the issue you > encountered. Can you please outline how you built the RPMs? > > Daniel -- if it's okay with you, I'd like to hold off on releasing > 3.1.4 until we get this issue clarified with Vladimir.

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Vladimir Vuksan wrote: > Little gripe about 3.1.4 (and looks like 3.1.3). Apparently SYSCONFDIR > has been changed to > > /etc > > instead of > > /etc/ganglia > > in the Makefile. This "breaks" the RPMS since the SPEC files are > configured to use /etc/ganglia and gmond will fail at startup :-(

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Vladimir: I tested the 3.1.4 RPMs I've built and did not observe the issue you encountered. Can you please outline how you built the RPMs? Daniel -- if it's okay with you, I'd like to hold off on releasing 3.1.4 until we get this issue clarified with Vladimir. Cheers, Bernard On Fri, Nov 2

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > I could do all that on Monday when I'm back in town. > Thanks Bernard, let me know when you are done and I'll move the OpenCSW packages from testing to current as well > Cheers, > > Bernard > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > On 11/20/

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-20 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Little gripe about 3.1.4 (and looks like 3.1.3). Apparently SYSCONFDIR has been changed to /etc instead of /etc/ganglia in the Makefile. This "breaks" the RPMS since the SPEC files are configured to use /etc/ganglia and gmond will fail at startup :-(. Perhaps we should be careful when makin

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-20 Thread Bernard Li
I could do all that on Monday when I'm back in town. Cheers, Bernard On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 11/20/2009 at 8:46 AM, in message <4b06b9d6.5080...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel > Pocock wrote: >> Brad Nicholes wrote: >> On 11/20/2009 at 8:07 AM, in messa

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] 3.1.4 to go GA?

2009-11-20 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 11/20/2009 at 8:46 AM, in message <4b06b9d6.5080...@pocock.com.au>, >>> Daniel Pocock wrote: > Brad Nicholes wrote: > On 11/20/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message <4b06b0af.1050...@pocock.com.au>, > Daniel > >> Pocock wrote: >> >>> Brad Nicholes wrote: >>> I've