Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-26 Thread Daniel Pocock
Daniel Pocock wrote: > Bernard Li wrote: > >> Hi Daniel: >> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> >>> Another issue I found: the gmond binary built on RHEL3 can't run properly >>> because APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE is not supported on that platform. The fix >>>

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Daniel: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > >> Another issue I found: the gmond binary built on RHEL3 can't run properly >> because APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE is not supported on that platform. The fix >> for this is relatively trivial, we will only

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Daniel: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > >> Another issue I found: the gmond binary built on RHEL3 can't run properly >> because APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE is not supported on that platform. The fix >> for this is relatively trivial, we will only

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-12 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 10/11/2009 at 10:36 PM, in message <4ad2b254.9090...@pocock.com.au>, >>> Daniel Pocock wrote: > Bernard Li wrote: >> Hi Brad: >> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: >> >> >>> If this is just a simple fix, then I would vote for scraping 3.1.3, rolling > 3.1.4 with t

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-12 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Daniel: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Another issue I found: the gmond binary built on RHEL3 can't run properly > because APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE is not supported on that platform.  The fix > for this is relatively trivial, we will only use that option for kernel >= >

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-11 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Brad: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > >> If this is just a simple fix, then I would vote for scraping 3.1.3, rolling >> 3.1.4 with the fix and resetting the test period. The other option, since >> this isn't a regression, would be to releas

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-01 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Brad: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > If this is just a simple fix, then I would vote for scraping 3.1.3, rolling > 3.1.4 with the fix and resetting the test period.  The other option, since > this isn't a regression, would be to release 3.1.3 as is with the defect >

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-01 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 10/1/2009 at 4:33 PM, in message , Bernard Li wrote: > So has anybody else given 3.1.3 a test run? > > I have found some minor issues. > > It looks like there are new configure options added in regards to > setuid and setgid: > > --enable-debug turn on debugging output and com