I'd like to re-add the BuildRequires for rrdtool-devel - this RPM is readily
available via the DAG/Dries repositories (for Red Hat and Fedora) and is
available as "rrdtool" on SuSE. This will make building on automatic build
systems much more conveinent.
Thanks,
Bernard
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:43:13AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Bernard,
> So, my question is: is it still a good idea to ship 3rd party stuff?
> On Linux, you usually have that stuff installed (or can get a RPM). On
> the other platforms you can always get the code from somewhere else
> easil
Bernard,
not from my side. Can you restrict that to the "gmetad" rpm only?
AFAIK, rrd-devel is only needed there.
In any case, this open up again the question of shipping 3rd party
code together with the sources. We do it for "apr", "confuse" and
"expat", but we don't for rrdtools. Not really c
Would anybody object if I add rrdtool-devel as a BuidRequires for the RPM? I
think this RPM is readily available so it would make it easier for folks to
rebuild the ganglia SRPM.
Cheers,
Bernard
