Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1 status?

2008-06-30 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Timothy: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Witham, Timothy D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When do bugzilla patches get considered for inclusion in trunk or > stable? It seems like the longer you wait the harder it is to apply the > patches. I always use patches from bz#38, 92, 176, 184 and 1

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1 status?

2008-06-30 Thread Witham, Timothy D
>Either way, submit patches via bugzilla.ganglia.info and we'll take it >from there. When do bugzilla patches get considered for inclusion in trunk or stable? It seems like the longer you wait the harder it is to apply the patches. I always use patches from bz#38, 92, 176, 184 and 186: http://b

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1 status?

2008-06-30 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:59:20PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there anything really broken in the current code? hope not, even if there are some minor issues that are most likely irrelevant if you are planning to work in some well supported architecture or find the current snapshots s

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1 status?

2008-06-30 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Daniel: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First of all, thanks for your interest in testing 3.1 and contributing to the project. > Is anyone using the Ganglia 3.1 code right now and able to share any > comments about it? > > Is there anything really broken in the cu