Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/01/12 23:52, Jeff Buchbinder wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Im Root wrote: >> I would be in agreement with the sentiments of the ganglia maintainers in >> that I too hate Windows. Unfortunately I'm stuck with it. > > The appropriate "windows solution" would be to create a C# po

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Jeff Buchbinder
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Im Root wrote: > I would be in agreement with the sentiments of the ganglia maintainers in > that I too hate Windows. Unfortunately I'm stuck with it. The appropriate "windows solution" would be to create a C# port of a gmond/pmond type service, much as NSClient++

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Im Root
uesday, January 17, 2012 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Im Root wrote: > It's commendable that there has been a lot of effort with the web interface. > However, if you can't monitor Windows, it's like building

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Jeff Buchbinder
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Im Root wrote: > It's commendable that there has been a lot of effort with the web interface. > However, if you can't monitor Windows, it's like building a Mercedes with > only 3 wheels. Yes, it nice to look at but yet it's missing a very important > component. I'

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
2012 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved Fixing gmond should be bumped up to the highest priority. This is not critical because there is an entirely adequate work around. It's been mentioned before.  Check out the host sflow agent. It works on every flavour

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Im Root
ubject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved Fixing gmond should be bumped up to the highest priority. This is not critical because there is an entirely adequate work around. It's been mentioned before.  Check out the host sflow agent. It works on every flavour of windows.  --Nick.

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Im Root
From: Daniel Pocock To: Im Root Cc: Vladimir Vuksan ; "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net" Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved On 17/01/12 21:17, Im Root wrote: > I can understand if obscure operating systems

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Nick Satterly
> Fixing gmond should be bumped up to the highest priority. This is not critical because there is an entirely adequate work around. It's been mentioned before. Check out the host sflow agent. It works on every flavour of windows. --Nick. On 17 Jan 2012, at 20:26, Daniel Pocock wrote: > F

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/01/12 21:17, Im Root wrote: > I can understand if obscure operating systems are overlooked, but it's > quite disturbing that the ganglia development community doesn't care if No one said they don't care - it's just that none of us are using that environment. If it is not something you are

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Im Root
the highest priority. From: Vladimir Vuksan To: Daniel Pocock Cc: "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net" Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved Apparently gmond on W2008 crashes systems. I do not have any W200

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Apparently gmond on W2008 crashes systems. I do not have any W2008 systems so can't test it. I would just note in release notes that Windows 2008 is not supported. That said I am not in favor of holding off the release. If someone wants to contribute Windows patches we can release that as 4.0.1

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/01/12 20:40, Im Root wrote: > I would like to politely correct Dan in that I was proposing the gmond > fix as opposed to providing it. I seriously think that all of the new > releases should be suspended until this critical bug has been addressed. > It does crash systems. Ok, so maybe we c

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Im Root
To: Im Root Cc: "ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net" Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:08 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved On 17/01/12 19:59, Im Root wrote: > We should also bundle the new monitor core with a version of gmond that > runs on Wi

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Sounds good. Let's call it 4.0.0. Who is gonna be the packager :-) ? Vladimir On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 17/01/12 19:59, Im Root wrote: >> We should also bundle the new monitor core with a version of gmond that >> runs on Windows 2008 r2 as well. The ganglia web front en

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/01/12 19:59, Im Root wrote: > We should also bundle the new monitor core with a version of gmond that > runs on Windows 2008 r2 as well. The ganglia web front end loses some of > it's monitoring functionality when it can't monitor basic operating > systems. Besides, it only makes sense to k

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Im Root
ents up to date which includes the collectors too. A nice web UI is useless without all of the data. From: Daniel Pocock To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 12:57 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-17 Thread Jeff Buchbinder
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Speaking of Ganglia Web we should release a new version of Ganglia with >> the new web frontend included. I propose following >> >> 1. Remove web-frontend from monitor-core >> 2. Allow Ganglia Web to be versioned separately for those that

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-16 Thread Daniel Pocock
> Speaking of Ganglia Web we should release a new version of Ganglia with > the new web frontend included. I propose following > > 1. Remove web-frontend from monitor-core > 2. Allow Ganglia Web to be versioned separately for those that want to get > more up to date web UI. We can call that gwe

[Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved

2012-01-16 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
I have moved Ganglia Web repo I have been working on under the Ganglia Github account. https://github.com/ganglia/ganglia-web Speaking of Ganglia Web we should release a new version of Ganglia with the new web frontend included. I propose following 1. Remove web-frontend from monitor-core 2. A