- Original Message
> From: Daniel Pocock
> To: Martin Knoblauch
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 4:47:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Policy on updating files in 3.1.x/contrib
>
> Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>
>> From: Daniel Pocock
>> To: Martin Knoblauch
>> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 1:04:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Po
>>> On 2/3/2010 at 5:04 AM, in message <4b696663.6010...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
>> what is the policy for updating files in the "contrib" directory of 3.0.x
> and 3.1.x? Do I need to do the backport approval dance (*)? Or can I just go
> ahead. The "removespikes.pl" file needs an
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Pocock
> To: Martin Knoblauch
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 1:04:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Policy on updating files in 3.1.x/contrib
>
>
> > what is the polic
> what is the policy for updating files in the "contrib" directory of 3.0.x
> and 3.1.x? Do I need to do the backport approval dance (*)? Or can I just go
> ahead. The "removespikes.pl" file needs an update in the 3.1.x branch.
>
>
Any updates to 3.1 require co-ordination from the release ma
Hi,
what is the policy for updating files in the "contrib" directory of 3.0.x and
3.1.x? Do I need to do the backport approval dance (*)? Or can I just go ahead.
The "removespikes.pl" file needs an update in the 3.1.x branch.
Cheers
Martin
(*) No, I never liked the process ...
---
