--- Jeong Bae Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Here is the diff -u output against Mike Hom's latest file (dated
> 5-24-2004).
>
>
>
> @@ -506,7 +506,14 @@
> */
> for (i = 0; cpu_id > 0; i++)
> {
> - if (p_online(i, P_STATUS) == -1 && errno == EINVAL) continue;
> +
response.
CPUs with legs? scary! =P
JB
From: Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeong Bae Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Solaris CPU (p_online) report bug.
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2
--- Jeong Bae Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi JB,
could you please send me a file with a "diff -u" style patch? I am
happy to applyit - assuming you have tested it on weird and non-weird
configs.
>
>
> Yes as you can see, we are deploying ganglia on big machines with
> not-so-frien
Hi,
I am a collegue of Mike Hom, who has recently submitted a fix on "kstat
cpu_info".
I've recently started playing around with Ganglia, and I must say it's
really nice!
On Solaris, we've run into a case where gmond would core when we had
non-sequential "on-line" CPUs.
On the code segment
