On 8/29/2008 at 6:52 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kostas Georgiou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:01:43AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Thanks Rich. This got me thinking a little about how the same thing
might be done only in a more generic way rather than just
On 8/30/2008 at 12:42 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 01:52:03AM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
Another option will be to have each module able to print some usable
configuration. I am attaching some patch from a
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 01:52:03AM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
Another option will be to have each module able to print some usable
configuration. I am attaching some patch from a quick hack that I wrote
for the multidisk plugin to output a usable .conf file. Maybe extending
the mudule api
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:01:43AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Thanks Rich. This got me thinking a little about how the same thing
might be done only in a more generic way rather than just
sequentially numbered metrics. I am wondering if, rather than
looping through numbers, we
I did a hack to allow a single config file to work across all of my
hosts, even though I needed mod_multicpu and had different numbers of
processors on different machines.
The hack I did was as follows:
When gmond found a metric name which contained one or more (#) pound
signs, I converted the
Thanks Rich. This got me thinking a little about how the same thing might be
done only in a more generic way rather than just sequentially numbered metrics.
I am wondering if, rather than looping through numbers, we actually tried to
do some pattern matching over the known metrics. For
