On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:36:38PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > then you are going to need either 2 public resources for all release
> > managers
> > to use consistently or a coordinate release process were the package is
> > generated and then independently binary packages are added to it bef
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:42:28PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 0
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:42:28PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Ok, but
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>>
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>>
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
b) should the choice of bootstrap environment be locked for
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>> b) should the choice of bootstrap environment be locked for all
>>> 3.1.X, and only changed when increasing the minor versi
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> a) is it preferred that we release 3.1.4 or that we release 3.1.5, or a
>> third option, roll a 3.1.6 tarball using the same environment where
>> 3.1.2 was bootstrapped?
>>
>
> 3.1.2
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> a) is it preferred that we release 3.1.4 or that we release 3.1.5, or a
> third option, roll a 3.1.6 tarball using the same environment where
> 3.1.2 was bootstrapped?
3.1.2 had a bootstrapping problem which resulted on it faili
Hi all,
There has been some discussion about which version of autotools to use
for bootstrapping
3.1.2 was bootstrapped with automake 1.9.6 and autoconf 2.59
3.1.4 was bootstrapped with automake 1.9.2 and autoconf 2.59
Some people test an alternative tarball bootstrapped with 1.10.1 and
aut
10 matches
Mail list logo