Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2010-01-08 Thread Kostas Georgiou
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:36:38PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > then you are going to need either 2 public resources for all release > > managers > > to use consistently or a coordinate release process were the package is > > generated and then independently binary packages are added to it bef

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2010-01-07 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:42:28PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Sun, Dec 0

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2010-01-07 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:42:28PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Ok, but

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2010-01-05 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> >>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >>

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2010-01-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:51:51PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > >> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >>>

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2009-12-28 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> >>> b) should the choice of bootstrap environment be locked for

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2009-12-06 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:28:04AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >>> b) should the choice of bootstrap environment be locked for all >>> 3.1.X, and only changed when increasing the minor versi

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2009-12-06 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> a) is it preferred that we release 3.1.4 or that we release 3.1.5, or a >> third option, roll a 3.1.6 tarball using the same environment where >> 3.1.2 was bootstrapped? >> > > 3.1.2

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2009-11-28 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:00:21AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > a) is it preferred that we release 3.1.4 or that we release 3.1.5, or a > third option, roll a 3.1.6 tarball using the same environment where > 3.1.2 was bootstrapped? 3.1.2 had a bootstrapping problem which resulted on it faili

[Ganglia-developers] bootstrapping for 3.1.X series and 3.2.X

2009-11-25 Thread Daniel Pocock
Hi all, There has been some discussion about which version of autotools to use for bootstrapping 3.1.2 was bootstrapped with automake 1.9.6 and autoconf 2.59 3.1.4 was bootstrapped with automake 1.9.2 and autoconf 2.59 Some people test an alternative tarball bootstrapped with 1.10.1 and aut