On 1/14/2009 at 3:10 PM, in message
dbdc3b250901141410l1b0acc6ar2cef894903829...@mail.gmail.com, Jesse Becker
haw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:56, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
Sounds good, can we condense the description below into something that we
can put
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:41:53PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 1/15/2009 at 8:56 AM, in message
496efa2a02ac0003a...@lucius.provo.novell.com, Brad Nicholes
bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
After taking a little closer look at the patch, I think we are OK as
far as the recursive call to
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Kostas Georgiou
k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:41:53PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 1/15/2009 at 8:56 AM, in message
496efa2a02ac0003a...@lucius.provo.novell.com, Brad Nicholes
bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
After taking a
Sounds good, can we condense the description below into something that we
can put into the 3.1 STATUS file so that we can start the process of getting
this backported into 3.1?
Brad
On 1/14/2009 at 10:00 AM, in message
dbdc3b250901140900ya3fc858qf17854e0b3be5...@mail.gmail.com, Jesse
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:00:29PM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 18:45, Kostas Georgiou
k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:10:31PM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote:
I suggest that once this is accepted, we release 3.1.2 ASAP.
Any possibility for
