That works. It is also inline with the way we specify data_source.
On Mar 1, 2004, at 2:57 PM, Matt Massie wrote:
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 14:49, Federico Sacerdoti wrote:
Matt,
I like the flexibility. However, it will be important to specify
multiple
masters for failover capabilities. This als
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 14:49, Federico Sacerdoti wrote:
> Matt,
> I like the flexibility. However, it will be important to specify multiple
> masters for failover capabilities. This also means gmond will be harder to
> configure since the unicast addresses will have to be explicitly called out.
> Bu
> i've just folded in all the gexec code into the main ganglia distribution.
Good news!
Thanks.
I'm a little confused by the changes to the Ganglia Web Frontend. Will
ganglia-web still work under Apache the same way it has in the past (files
installed by the RPM under the /var/www/html/ganglia d
.
As for the name, how about "Berkeley hippie tree-hugger"? I think it has a
nice ring to it... ;)
-Federico
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Massie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ganglia Developers"
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:17 PM
Subject: [Gang
guys-
i've just folded in all the gexec code into the main ganglia
distribution. the gexec source will be ignored on platforms that do not
support it (currently it only runs on linux and freebsd). i'm sure that
gexec will be ported to even more platforms in the near future.
i've changed the way
r mute.
-Bruce
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Josh Durham
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 11:16 PM
> To: Matt Massie
> Cc: Ganglia Developers
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] the multicast chains ha
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 20:43, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:17:05PM -0800, Matt Massie wrote:
> > brooks... when you have time can you check it on FreeBSD? any HPUX,
> > Tru64, etc gurus should check their systems as well and let me know.
> >
> > i tried to compile 2.6.0 on the
I'm going to stop being a fly on the wall for a second and make a few quick
comments:
> very soon gexec will be folded into the distribution as well.
This is really great news. I hope gexec and authd will continue to be
supported as Ganglia goes forward. I find them extremely useful in
productio
Personally, I think that complicates things.
I'd keep one variable for the port, regardless of whether it is
unicast, or multicast. What might work, is that if msg_channel = a
local interface, listen, else send to msg_channel.
Also, do the mute/deaf flags still apply? So, you can mute a gmo
doh.
clearly.. i need to change that.
msg_port_out
msg_port_in
perhaps? i meant.. it only open the port if msg_port_in is explicitly
set.
excuse me while i go hang my head in shame and quickly alter the code.
-matt
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 20:42, Josh Durham wrote:
> > if it's a unicast channe
if it's a unicast channel, gmond configures itself a little
differently.
gmond will send messages on the unicast channel (which will write to a
single host) but it will NOT listen to unicast messages unless
"msg_port" is explicitly set.
I may be missing something here, but how do you configure
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:17:05PM -0800, Matt Massie wrote:
> i think brooks comment on the compressed XML is right on target. it
> doesn't make sense to make put zlib compression on a separate port. it
> make more sense to have a web server port (and the old style simple tcp
> socket as well).
ok
so the title is a little extreme (but true).
i've been workin' hella hard to get the 2.6.0 release ready to go. the
2.5.7 release i've talked about (w/ the great solaris stuff and xml
compression).. got morphed into 2.6.0 before it was released. we might
as well go for the gold here and give
13 matches
Mail list logo
