RE: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.3 RPMs

2006-04-27 Thread Bernard Li
, it should be x86_64 rather than AMD64 :-) From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 24/04/2006 15:28 To: Bernard Li; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.3 RPMs --- Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.3 RPMs

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Martin: > > > > Also, should I follow what Martin did by renaming the files to > state > > > the distro it was built on? > > > > > > > the question is - does that hurt the RPM process in any way? If > not, > > *I* would say do it. > > It won'

RE: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.3 RPMs

2006-04-24 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Martin: > > Also, should I follow what Martin did by renaming the files to state > > the distro it was built on? > > > > the question is - does that hurt the RPM process in any way? If not, > *I* would say do it. It won't hurt the process, but if you do a 'rpm -qip' on the RPMs, it'll st

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.3 RPMs

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Bernard, --- Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can upload Ganglia RPMs to SourceForge for a bunch of distro/archs, > would that be helpful? > please do. They are of course useful > Also, should I follow what Martin did by renaming the files to state > the distro it was built on? >