> I have made changes to the development version of rrdtool's graph mode
that
> introduces a "--full-size-mode" option which, when enabled, will cause the
> -width and -height parameters to refer to that actual size of the output
> image. The main graph area is automatically adjusted based on t
Matt,
cool. This would make the size calculations for the web frontend much
much easier. I always wondered why RRDTOOL does not have a way to
specify the size of the whole image.
Cheers
Martin
--- Matthew Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have made changes to the development version of r
I have made changes to the development version of rrdtool's graph mode that
introduces a "--full-size-mode" option which, when enabled, will cause the
-width and -height parameters to refer to that actual size of the output
image. The main graph area is automatically adjusted based on the space
ne
Of Gilad Raphaelli
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 5:56 PM
> To: Nick Galbreath
> Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
>
> Nick,
>
> Well I'm glad its not just something I'm doing wrong
> - th
Nick,
Well I'm glad its not just something I'm doing wrong
- thanks for the explanation. I'm not desperate for a
fix, just wanted to do some local development work on
the frontend. I'm looking forward to testing out
early versions including the libapr changes. For now
VMWare w/Ubuntu runs gme
yes, I've seen this on a mac too.
The gmetad code is somewhat odd in that is uses "poll" one file descriptor
at time, one thread at a time. which is not how it's normally used. I
_THINK_ this was done to do read timeouts on the socket, however this can
now be done safely with libapr. (it's real
On a seperate note, are you running gmetad on a mac?
I've been unable to get it to run on an intel mac,
debug reports:
The remote machine closed connection for [localhost]
data source after 1023 bytes read
It usually reports 1023 or 2046 bytes but occasionally
it actually gets the full 3069 byte
age-
>> From: Ramon Bastiaans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:57 AM
>> To: Matthew Chambers
>> Cc: 'Richard Grevis'; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
>>
on Bastiaans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:57 AM
> > To: Matthew Chambers
> > Cc: 'Richard Grevis'; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
> >
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew Chambers
Sent: 08 May 2007 16:59
To: 'Ramon Bastiaans'
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; 'Richard Grevis'
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
I think yo
#x27;; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
>
> I believe rrdtool hasn't seen any development for over a year, so don't
> get your hopes up too high for the short term.
>
> - Ramon.
>
-
In the end though, I don’t think it’s feasible to really predict what
> the legend is going to do from the PHP. The best place to do that is in
> rrdtool. I hope Tobi Oetiker is amenable to such a change (I’m thinking
> of two new options, one like --awidth for actual image width a
for
actual image height).
-Matt
_
From: Richard Grevis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
Doh,
Sorry, I misread your mail. Ignore '-' stuff, but what I
Monday, May 07, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Matthew Chambers
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Web frontend graph sizes
Matt,
I'm not sure I like the idea of outputting to /dev/null, it seems like we
will be making the web server twice as much raster wor
Matt,
I'm not sure I like the idea of outputting to /dev/null, it seems like
we will be making the web server twice as much raster work and
increasing the load unnecessarily.
Also I thought this problem had already been solved by removing width
and height attributes from the img tags, in web
15 matches
Mail list logo
