This is such a common misconception that the development team should
consider removing the name field from the data_source configuration line
entirely.
Fundamentally, cluster names come from the gmond.conf files. The names of
datasources exist only to confuse the hell out of you and create bugs.
Thanks, Rick. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the problem I'm
running into. I do have the cluster name set to Datanodes in all the
client. Otherwise, I wouldn't expect it to show all of them when I
click Show Hosts.
dbr
Rick Cobb wrote:
This is such a common misconception that the
One more time trying to get this thread back on the list instead of just
between David me.
And I'll disclaim expertise on 3.1 here. On the other hand, I've been in
this code more times than I wanted to in 3.0, and I don't think the
fundamental design of gmetad was affected by 3.0 - 3.1.
I'm not
Rick,
Thanks for your help on this. That's disappointing. I guess I'll
either move to unicast or set up multicast routing. I like the ease and
redundancy of multicast, but I don't really like having all my nodes
broadcast continually across the entire cluster.
Have a great weekend!
dbr
4 matches
Mail list logo
