-
From: John Vega
To: gatortalk@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:41 PM
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: I am beginning to taste some Vol BBQ!
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Steve McKibben wrote:
In any event, I'm glad we're having this debate/discussion a
groups.com] On
Behalf Of John Vega
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:41 PM
To: gatortalk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: I am beginning to taste some Vol BBQ!
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Steve McKibben wrote:
In any event, I'm glad we're having this debate/di
>
> Give Alabama, Ole Miss, LSU or even Arky those two turnovers, and we may
> see a different result.
>
That's exactly what I told my wife too...during the game (not that she was
totally listening to me or anything!!!)
I still think that if Tebow didn't fumble the second one, we would be
talking
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Steve McKibben wrote:
> In any event, I'm glad we're having this debate/discussion after a
> win, instead of after a loss!
Preach on, brother!
The last time I remember Tebow losing two turnovers was against Ole
Miss.
I think that it is a good measure of how fa
Zeb wrote:
--
I guess that the point for me is that giving up a 70 yard touchdown drive after
a fumble is no different than giving up a 70 yard touchdown drive after a
fumble unless we either:
1.
I agree with that - but that makes it a 7 point swing, not 14.
I assume UT would try to score by running the ball whether down by 24
or 17, and that's exactly what it did. Of course, it probably
wouldn't have happened but for a celebration penalty, but that would
have happened regardless.
I
One argument (monday morning...arm chair...whatever!) is the score would
have been 30-6 and that could affect the way a team plays/responds.
You say that from 20 yard line, they could have scored easily since they did
take it all the way fro 4 yard line...but anything "could have" happened!
I am
-4239
_
From: gatortalk@googlegroups.com [mailto:gatort...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of John Vega
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:25 AM
To: gatortalk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: I am beginning to taste some Vol BBQ!
On Sep 19, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Jerry Belloit wrote:
It was a
e can only imagine what kind of
shell they'd have gone into after a Gator TD at that point.
--- On Mon, 9/21/09, John Vega wrote:
From: John Vega
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: I am beginning to taste some Vol BBQ!
To: gatortalk@googlegroups.com
Date: Monday, September 21, 2009, 11:25 AM
On Sep 19
UT started that drive at about their own 30 after the return on Tebow's fumble.
John Vega wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Jerry Belloit wrote:
>
> > It was a good clean strip of the ball that caused Tim’s fumble.
> > Without it, the Gators win big I believe. It was a 14 point
On Sep 19, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Jerry Belloit wrote:
> It was a good clean strip of the ball that caused Tim’s fumble.
> Without it, the Gators win big I believe. It was a 14 point swing
> right there alone.
How?
Had we scored, we would have had to kick off afterwards.
UT started that drive
I can't believe an fumble and a some really bad calls!
Tebow's interception sure looked like a trapped ball. I think most times
that call would be overturned.
That was a bad, inconsistent unsportsmanlike conduct call.
It was a good clean strip of the ball that caused Tim's fumble. Wit
even after that fumble?
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jerry Belloit wrote:
> It’s about time for a little Vol BBQ. Tennessee’s defense is beginning to
> tire and the Gator D seems to have made the proper adjustments. I am still
> expecting the Gators to beat the spread.
>
>
>
> Jerry
>
> >
me too...my dream of scoring 100 points was just that...a big DREAM!
Go Gators!!!
-BadMan
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jerry Belloit wrote:
> It’s about time for a little Vol BBQ. Tennessee’s defense is beginning
> to tire and the Gator D seems to have made the proper adjustments. I am
14 matches
Mail list logo
