http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Delhi_HC_to_take_up_PIL_on_gay_rights/articleshow/3054907.cms

20 May 2008, 0259 hrs IST,Shibu Thomas,TNN

MUMBAI: In a tony neighbourhood in Andheri, Rahul, a 25-year-old IT
professional, shares an apartment with Brian (27), who works at a
multi-national bank. For the last two years, their landlord and neighbours
know them as perfect roommates, but to friends and a few family members they
are a gay couple.

In a country where homosexual acts are punishable with life imprisonment,
few like Rahul and Brian manage to make a home for themselves. A public
interest litigation being heard in Delhi HC this week seeking to
decriminalise homosexuality is being watc-hed with bated breaths by the
lesbian and gay
community<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Delhi_HC_to_take_up_PIL_on_gay_rights/articleshow/3054907.cms#>.


"Living with one's partner is taken for granted by my straight friends, but
I have to make sure who I tell about our relationship," said Rahul, the more
outspoken one who has also told his family about himself. Brian is still to
decide what to tell his parents.

"The Constitution guarantees the right to privacy and right to health, but
the law treats gay people as criminals whose rights can be abrogated," said
Lesley Esteves, a
lesbian<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Delhi_HC_to_take_up_PIL_on_gay_rights/articleshow/3054907.cms#>activist
and spokesperson for Voices Against 377 a coalition of LGBT,
women's and human rights activists. Voices is one of the organisations that
has filed an intervention application in the high court seeking a "reading
down" of the law.

Section 377 says "whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the
order of nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished with
imprisonment of either up to 10 years or life". Enacted in 1860, it was more
stringent than anti-sodomy laws that existed in English law of the time.

The section says, "Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal
intercourse necessary for the offence. It includes a whole range of offences
from mutual masturbation, to fellatio and anal sex."

The Law Commission in 2001 had recommended a repeal of Section 377, a move
backed by the Union ministry of family and child welfare in 2006. The law,
however, remains.

Gay<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Delhi_HC_to_take_up_PIL_on_gay_rights/articleshow/3054907.cms#>activist
and founder of NGO Humsafar Ashok Row Kavi explains that the PIL
does not seek a repeal of Section 377. "The court has been urged to read
down Section 377, so as to decriminalise homosexuality," said Kavi, adding
that more than legal repercussions, it is the social consequences that makes
the law draconian

-- 
My blog's at: http://queerindia.blogspot.com
You can leave me a voice message from any phone at
http://www.jaxtr.com/nitinkarani No call charges apply.

Reply via email to