Obviously I'd like to believe the contention in this piece, but I 
have to say I'm slightly dubious. First, I don't know why sexuality 
has to be singled out like this, even in a positive way. Some people 
are good bosses because their personalities are like that, and they 
could be gay or straight or any of the shades in between. 

Even if one allows, just for the sake of discussion, that sexuality 
might make a difference in your workplace skills, I still don't see 
why this should automatically make gay men better bosses. The article 
quotes a writer saying "Gay people are constantly having to dodge and 
weave and assess how and where they're going as they grow up. And 
that manifests itself as three huge skills: adaptability, intuitive 
communications, and creative problem-solving." 

And yes, I can see how that happens, but against it I can put other 
things. I know gay men who become so obsessed with controlling all 
aspects of their lives that it probably seeps into their work as 
well, making them annoying bosses. And if straight men can be 
affected by sexy women colleagues, gay men will be affected by sexy 
male colleagues - and that doesn't just have to manifest itself as 
sexually harassing them, as one nasty stereotype has it. 

In fact it can go the other way. You can be so scared of seeming to 
sexually harass someone that you just seize up and become ultra 
formal. I know that I'm not always comfortable around really good 
looking colleagues - not because I'm afraid I'll let go and ravish 
them, but because I often do become tongue tied and nervous around 
really good looking guys, whether at parties or the workplace. 

My own, very limited experience, of being a boss was certainly not 
great. Years back when I worked in advertising I had two people 
working under me - one, a guy, with who I got on famously (he was 
completely straight and I wasn't attracted to him, but he was cool 
and we became friends) and a woman with who, well, I did not. 

Normally I get on very well with women, but this one was just a cow 
and I loathed her and since I didn't know how to deal with women, I 
just stopped dealing with her and ended up doing most of her work. 
And I was doing most of the guy's work too because we were friends 
and I wasn't delegating to him as I should have. 

As might be expected my career as a boss was not great and it was one 
of the reasons that pushed me to leave advertising and become a 
journalist where I was careful never to get into a situation where I 
have people working under me. But this is me, and I can think of 
other gay guys who are probably great bosses. So what do people 
think - does your sexuality affect your ability to be a boss? And 
what have your experiences been? 

Vikram


Why Gay Men Make the Best Bosses
America's most desirable managers all have one thing in common: 
homosexuality. Read our take then post your comments below.
—By Danielle Sacks

http://men.style.com/details/blogs/details/workplace_sexuality/index.h
tml

Only three months into his senior manager gig at a Fortune 500 
company, Matthew Klein was in way over his head. "I finally walked 
into my boss's office, threw my hands in the air, and said, 'I'm 
feeling totally overwhelmed and inadequate,'" he explains. "I 
basically had a breakdown." Many managers would have reacted to such 
a display by telling him to get back out there and grow a pair. But 
Klein's boss had the opposite reaction: First he reassured Klein he 
was doing a great job, then he helped him prioritize his workload so 
that it became manageable. "It's not like he's this fuzzy guy who 
would reach across the table and hug you in a meeting—he's tough as 
nails," says Klein of Robert Ollander-Krane, who is director of 
learning and development for the company. "But he allowed me to be 
completely honest about my circumstances. Now we have this huge 
foundation of trust."

Wouldn't that be nice—a boss who actually gave a damn. And while it's 
not conclusive, evidence suggests that one of the reasons Ollander-
Krane is so effective is that he's part of a new breed—gay managers—
who could be becoming America's most desirable bosses.

In The G Quotient: Why Gay Executives Are Excelling as Leaders . . . 
and What Every Manager Needs to Know, author and USC business-school 
professor Kirk Snyder argues that gay bosses embody a style of 
personalized attention that allows high-maintenance Gen Xers and Yers 
to maximize their performance. "Gay executives tend to look at how 
each individual brings unique abilities, and they see their job as 
figuring out how best to take advantage of those skills," he says. 

In fact, during Snyder's five-year study of American executives, he 
stumbled on some startling findings: Gay male bosses produce 35 to 60 
percent higher levels of employee engagement, satisfaction, and 
morale than straight bosses. This is no small achievement: According 
to human-resources consulting firm Towers Perrin, only a measly 14 
percent of the global corporate workforce are fully engaged by their 
jobs. And the Saratoga Institute, a group that measures the 
effectiveness of HR departments, found that in a study of 20,000 
workers who had quit their jobs, the primary motivator for jumping 
ship was their supervisors' behavior.

So what makes gay bosses different? It may have to do with the way 
they survived high school. "Gay people are constantly having to dodge 
and weave and assess how and where they're going as they grow up," 
says Snyder. "And that manifests itself as three huge skills: 
adaptability, intuitive communications, and creative problem-
solving." In other words, your boss is cool with your leaving a 
little early one day a week to pick up your kid from school, or happy 
to offer a learning experience that helps you close a crucial deal. 

Gay executives note that the reflection and candidness required for 
coming out mean that by the time they get to the workplace, gay men 
are often secure in their identity and don't feel the need to abuse 
people in order to boost their ego. "It makes you really honest with 
yourself and everyone around you," says Chris McCarthy, a vice 
president at MTV Networks who came out 10 years ago. He believes the 
experience has allowed him to tap into the individual needs of his 
seven team members, including two discontented employees whom he 
recently helped find new positions within the company. "I think it's 
really important that you give people the opportunity to have self-
respect, even if that means helping them leave a job in the way they 
want to," he explains. 

And this kind of empathetic management style is both gay and straight 
benefiting employees. When Brian Wachur, 23, wasn't getting the 
promotion he'd been waiting for at his D.C. PR firm, he approached 
his gay manager, Jason Smith. "I was nervous about what he was going 
to say, but he was able to tell me where I could improve in a really 
constructive way," he says. "It was a big contrast to other managers 
I had had in the past." Wachur soon got the new title, and he now 
considers Smith his professional mentor. "It's definitely surprising 
to me that I have a 38-year-old gay male in my life who is such a 
huge influence." 

Matthew Klein says that working for a gay boss has taught him that 
emotionally honest doesn't equate to weak in the workplace. "Your 
typical hetero male is programmed as a boy that there are two 
emotions: angry and tired," he says. "These are gross limitations 
that restrict our ability to be great managers." 

But being gay doesn't give you a monopoly on management skills. "The 
only managers that succeed are ones that have energy and are outgoing 
and interested," says Richard Laermer, the gay CEO of a New York-
based PR firm and co-author of Punk Marketing: Get Off Your Ass and 
Join the Revolution. "If that's a gay thing, then mazel tov, but I 
know the same number of straight managers who are emotional and 
caring." And one gay vice president at a financial firm says his 
leadership traits come from his life history, not from anything 
related to his sexual orientation. "I was in the military, in a 
fraternity, and played a varsity sport," he says. "I feel like I 
spend my life explaining that what I'm saying or doing has nothing to 
do with the fact that I'm gay." 

That said, if your new boss happens to be gay, chances are you'll be 
happier and more fulfilled in your job. And even if you're not, the 
consolation is that there's still one area in which he's likely to 
excel. Says Smith, "We throw the fiercest holiday parties." 

Posted by stylemens 2:33:27 PM


Comments
great - and true!

capnjon
Feb 15, 2007 11:07:46 AM 

what if you think your boss is closeted?

elcerulo
Feb 15, 2007 3:02:06 PM 

This is basically saying that gay men tend to have better 
personalities than straight men. Um, good thing we aren't 
generalizing...

nyk718
Feb 21, 2007 1:02:52 PM 

This article sounds almost as though it were written ABOUT my boss. 
Just today I needed to leave early for a dinner date. His response to 
my request? "Have a good time. :)" After 5+ years of working for this 
man, I couldn't be happier.

rednoc
Feb 21, 2007 6:23:12 PM 

One shouldn't make these generalizations. My experience with a gay 
boss is exactly the opposite. I was actually excited about our new 
boss, who was openly gay. He seemed upbeat, creative and thoughtful, 
and I thought we'd have a really positive work environment. He turned 
out to be a power-hungry paranoid suck-up who would throw anyone 
under the bus to make himself look good. He talked badly about people 
behind their backs and then got completely outraged and lashed out at 
our entire group when he thought someone had said something about him 
(which wasn't even true). He demanded total loyalty, but rather than 
respect his employees he instead acted like he was so much better -- 
smarter, more creative, wittier. It got to the point that I 
eventually left the company because of him.

cocomuyloco
Feb 21, 2007 8:24:56 PM 

I have to disagree with the blanket statement that gay men make 
better bosses--better CO-WORKERS, perhaps, but certainly not better 
bosses. I worked for a very large department store in the Men's Suits 
department--store name beginning with "N". My gay boss was bitchier 
and far more gossipy than ANY woman I ever worked for. Having said 
that, my best friend is a gay man and was my Man of Honor in my 
wedding. He knows EXACTLY what I'm talking about...maybe I'm making a 
blanket statement about one very bad experience, but this gay boss 
told horrible lies about me, other straight women and generally had a 
problem telling the truth. He sued another large company ("M") based 
on a fake discrimination lawsuit just to get money from Federation. I 
would be terrified to work for another gay man because of the 
backstabbing, lies, and absolute lack of scruples this man possessed.

Divajulia
Feb 22, 2007 1:49:27 PM 

What the author says is true and makes logical sense. The best boss I 
ever had was in the finance industry and he was an out of the closet 
gay man. He was one of the toughest bosses but also the most fair and 
inclusive. He gave me a shot at developing a new service line and the 
autonomy to do it to the best of my ability. Interesting take on the 
management crisis in America.

mojofixer
Feb 22, 2007 4:25:48 PM 

Will it be discriminatory to post a job listing saying: "gay men 
preferred"?

In the American Indiana world of old gay tribesmen were honored since 
they had the intuition of both sexes.

twight
Feb 23, 2007 2:01:51 PM 

I gotta admit, I love my gay boss. Way more than I've ever loved my 
straight bosses, most of whom spent the majority of our interactions 
looking at my tits. I don't think all straight bosses are like that --
 I think I just have better luck with gay men in the work place. I'm 
more sure of their motivations.

Straker
Feb 23, 2007 9:08:48 PM 

Hard to generalize. I am a gay boss and find that staff feel very 
comfortable coming to me with issues, much more so than to our 
straight female director. Not sure if it has to do with how I 
negotiated high school! On the other hand, I have known snarky gay 
coworkers that no one wanted to work for....

hunta
Feb 24, 2007 8:14:10 AM 

As a young handsome male that's KINDA gay, older gay mentor-like 
males and females have enriched my life in great ways. Gay mentors 
have helped me get over personal conflicts regarding family, social, 
and financial issues. And even though I cant say that it was their 
sexuality that influenced their support, their gayness is a big part 
of who they really are. Now, this is funny. My last gay boss was fun 
and I had a great time working with him. In fact, I preferred working 
with him more than working with the high-strung women. Above all, I 
liked when he confessed secrets, his needs and wants, because thru 
that I was in the loop of what was happening underground: in his 
juicy personal life, the juicy down low/gay world and the juicy 
things that go on at work that people dont talk about. And yes our 
work was great. 

DH
Feb 25, 2007 10:44:00 AM 

Now I know. I'm a straight man trapped in the body of a straight boss 
who wants to be the best gay boss he can be.

nicksta
Feb 25, 2007 9:49:04 PM 

I think the article is true and false, I actually had 2 gay bosses 
before me and one was pretty cool and had a great personality. But, 
did not know how to manage a team (favortism, coming in late 
everyday, etc.) When he left my other gay boss was just mean. He had 
no communication skills and was kind of a snob( although he had no 
reason to be.) Since I am gay and I got the job they both had, I 
learned from their mistakes and made my own way. I do agree that as a 
boss I am bit more empathetic and kind of have that sixth sense 
towards knowing how my staff feels.But overall I just think it comes 
down to the person and what their work style is like.

rugger90046
Feb 26, 2007 9:31:54 AM 

Why Gay Men Make Better Bosses? Give me a break. Kirk Snyder has done 
no real scientific evidence for this claim whatsoever and it's sad 
that he's going around manipulating the old stereotypes that say a 
man is reason and woman emotion to come out at the other end with 
gays are thus a perfect balance who are superior in the workplace. 
It's absurd. If so, why just the workplace huh? Why not THE 
WORLD???!!! This is a perfect example of the extent to which our 
society is willing to accept idealized and exaggerated constructions 
of gender...Details must've really needed an article.

class09
Feb 26, 2007 1:08:13 PM 

Interesting that the article quotes only men. I worked for a gay boss 
who was extremely intelligent with a great sense of humor and was 
well-loved. However, he was awful when it came to promoting people to 
higher levels of management and consistenly selected young, good-
looking straight boys. He had different standards for the women in 
the office and was particularly disdainful of Lesbians. That said, I 
agree with the posters that this article is poorly conceived. Can you 
imagine someone writing an article in WSJ saying that straight men 
make the best bosses?

gogo5
Feb 27, 2007 8:41:19 AM 

I doubt if the article was about black men, hispanic men, straight 
women, lesbians, or any other combination of ethnicity and gender 
that it would cause such an uproar. I think because it's about gay 
men that it threatens those who consider their power coming from the 
status quo--straight white male power--and rail against it. Based on 
this article, it sounds plausable and my own experience even supports 
it. Just today I heard about a new report from the Conference Board 
that job satisfaction is at an all time low because people hate their 
bosses. Perhaps this article is more on the money than not. 

slydogg
Feb 27, 2007 10:24:13 AM 

This is a very good article. I do have to say though, that we are all 
human beings and whether gay or straight, it has nothing to do with 
what kind of a boss a person turns out be. I have had straigth bosses 
that were totally great and gay bosses that made me angry all the 
time and vice versa. How a person turns out e is not solely 
determined by his or her sexual orientation. Of course there are the 
typical sterotypes, but that does not mean everysingle one is like 
that.

hotrod79
Feb 27, 2007 6:41:17 PM 

Being a good boss depends mainly on the individual. Gay men may be a 
little more understanding about problems than striaght. But I have 
heard about good and bad bosses that include gay, lesbian, straight 
men and women. So that is why I believe that being a good bossit 
mainly depends on the integrity and experience of the individual.

chefjonms
Feb 28, 2007 3:27:09 PM 

I'm an Area Manager (yes, retail) and am gay. I've been told time and 
time again that I make my employees jobs more fun because I'm gay. 
I've recently started looking for other employment and all of my 
employees have pretty much begged me not to leave and, if I did, they 
may go as well. I think gay guys are easier to work for - we're more 
understanding and we most of actually do care about our employees. 
Women - straight and lesbian - are by far the worst bosses! There's 
too much of a power struggle with them. 

bosgymcat
Mar 2, 2007 9:55:13 AM 

It's called Emotional Intelligence. It really works when striving for 
sustained results.

ProfessionalMale
Mar 6, 2007 8:04:55 AM 

I enjoyed reading the comments almost as much as the article. I am 
a "gay boss." I appreciate that the article brings to light a fact 
that being "gay" in or out (no pun intended) of the work place is not 
a weakness or something to fear. I know for a fact a lot of straight 
women and men in my work place would agree with much, if not all of 
the article...especially the part about the "fierce holiday parties!"

puktor
Mar 13, 2007 4:46:33 PM 

"In fact, during Snyder's five-year study of American executives, he 
stumbled on some startling findings: Gay male bosses produce 35 to 60 
percent higher levels of employee engagement, satisfaction, and 
morale than straight bosses"

sounds pretty scientific to me! the point of this article is not to 
say ALL gay bosses are better than ALL straight bosses, just that 
they TEND to be better, based on STATISTICS that were borne out of a 
STUDY. of course, there will always be exceptions to every "rule" 
(like... not all smokers get lung cancer but they have a much greater 
probability than non-smokers.). 

statistics will never tell you the absolute truth about any specific 
individual or circumstance, they just point you in the direction of 
the trend.

cuddlebuddy666
Mar 16, 2007 11:31:03 AM 

Well if you've ever taken a statistics class (or just any good 
science course, for that matter) then you'll know that results from a 
study can be manipulated as they are dependent on so many variables 
(efficacy, source pool, etc.). In Snyder's case, his so-
called "STUDY" seems doomed for scientific failure from the beginning 
as his thesis relating to sexuality and success in the workplaces 
seems inevitably cornered into, as it is referred to in gender 
studies, "the hall of mirrors". In the hall of mirrors stereotypes 
(which are nonscientific) are quite unfortunately accepted as fact--
as they are in this "study"--and in the end, prove nothing of 
scientific signifcance. More specifically it seems that Snyder has 
unconsciously and so very UNSCIENTIFICALLY recycled the ancient 
clichés that say there are differences regarding gender and then 
lended this hackneyed argument towards superiority and inferiority of 
character, of all places, in the workplace, based on something as 
complex as a peron's sexuality. In doing this, the line between 
stereotype and real SCIENTIFIC findings have become blurred and thus 
the stereotype, not the SCIENTIFIC results, have become part the 
general truth of his argument (i.e., reinforcing old stereotypes) and 
arriving at nonsignificant data and a very sweeping generalization. I 
have to say, it is naive to embrace everything a "scientific study" 
has claimed to have discovered without questioning how this data was 
arrived at first. Furthermore, it's pitiful the people at Details 
don't know this, or if they do, that they don't care, not because I 
expect great articles from a fashion magazine, but because, as is 
apparent from this discussion board, the majority of its readers take 
everything that it publishes at face value.

class09
Mar 16, 2007 6:24:58 PM 

Reply via email to