On 2005-03-29, at 05:59, Wei Qin wrote:
Hello GCC developers,
I am avid user of gcc and have 5 cross-gcc's installed on my machine.
Thanks for your great work. Recently I want to do some compiler work
that involves analyzing low level intermediate representation. I
thought about using research comp
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:25:00 -0500, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 14:27 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Christian Joensson wrote:
> > > Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
> > > sun4u:
> >
> > > I get thes
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
>> Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Might this likely work? And if so, possibly be worthy of consideration to
>> enable the more efficient description and optimization of traditional cc0
>> target machines (and possibly be beneficial for other ISA's as well)?
>
Jason Merrill wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:29:09 -0800, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
19317 C++ problems with temporary return values
This patch breaks Qt builds. One of my patches is implicated, but I
believe that the consensus is that this is an NRV bug. Jason made
several attem
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:29:09 -0800, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 19317 C++ problems with temporary return values
>
> This patch breaks Qt builds. One of my patches is implicated, but I
> believe that the consensus is that this is an NRV bug. Jason made
> several attempts at f
Hello GCC developers,
I am avid user of gcc and have 5 cross-gcc's installed on my machine.
Thanks for your great work. Recently I want to do some compiler work
that involves analyzing low level intermediate representation. I
thought about using research compilers such as SUIF or SUIF II but
thos
I've tried the dot-product loop and some other loops on Itanium machine. The
machine description of the target processor has DFA defined for it. The
function "sms_schedule" is invoked, but no loop is SMS scheduled.
> This is highly dependent on the target processor for which you are trying
> to
On 25 Mar 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 2) Reload requires the ability to insert arbitrary instructions
> > >between any pair of instructions. The instructions inserted by
> > >reload will load registers from memory, store registers to me
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:58:11PM -0800, James E Wilson wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> >In trying to do "gmake dvi" in the build directory, the
> >gfortran.texi eventually dies with
>
> I noticed something similar, though the error messages I get are quite
> different. I tried taking a look. Th
Steve Kargl wrote:
In trying to do "gmake dvi" in the build directory, the
gfortran.texi eventually dies with
I noticed something similar, though the error messages I get are quite
different. I tried taking a look. There is a gfortran.log file that
lists the errors. I had to type ^Z while texi
zouq wrote:
> /home/cpu/source/gcc-4.1-20050327/gcc/config/mips/mips.c:3976: error:
> structure has no member named `truthvalue_conversion'
This is the info we needed. Looking at the ChangeLog file, I see that
this was accidentally broken by Joseph Myers last week. I posted a
followup to the pa
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 14:27 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Christian Joensson wrote:
> > Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
> > sun4u:
>
> > I get these failures and just would like to ping for any ideas what
> > might be wrong...
> >
>
- 源邮件 -
主题: Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327
发件人: "zouq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
日期: Tue, 三月 29, 2005 8:21 am
收件人: "James E Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
en, sorry, be
Steven Bosscher wrote:
OK, so I know this is not a popular subject, but can we *please* stop
working on loop.c and focus on getting the new RTL and tree loop passes
to do what we want?
I don't think anyone is objecting to this. My answers in an earlier
thread were a little confused because I didn
Steven Bosscher wrote:
As far as I can tell, there is no architecture requirement that p1 and
p2 must be a register pair (ie. p6,p7 or p2,p3, etc.), but that seems
to be the only form that GCC can produce.
Perhaps this was done this way to avoid insn patterns with two sets?
It was done this way bec
zouq wrote:
> i build a crosscompiler for gcc, abi=n32 gcc-4.1-20050327/configure
> -target=mips64el-linux -prefix=/opt/gcc-4.1-20050327/
> -enable-languages=c --disable-shared make it will error with
> config/mips/mips.c
We need more info than what you have provided. In particular, we need
to kn
On Mar 28, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Christian Joensson wrote:
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
sun4u:
I get these failures and just would like to ping for any ideas what
might be wrong...
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-
This is highly dependent on the target processor for which you are trying
to schedule the loops. For example, If the machine description of the
target processor doesn't have DFA defined for it SMS is not performed at
all. One good example of a loop that would be scheduled in SMS (on a G5
machin
Zack Weinberg wrote:
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The code for these testcases submitted so far are about 12 lines a piece
and have almost nothing which can tell where they came from (Other than
comments in the code).
That's probably fine then. IIRC, previous discussion of this has
g
28 07:44:16 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Compiler version: 4.1.0 20050328 (experimental)
Platform: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc64-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-multilib --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++
I get these failures and
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Biagio Lucini wrote:
>
> > The gomp branch fails to bootstrap for libtool problems in libgomp.
> > Verified on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and on i686-unknown-linux-gnu.
> >
> > It appears that the fix is pretty eas
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:07:09PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sunday, March 27, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
> >Now I'm willing to fix those tests by adding -fno-show-column where
> >necessary
>
> Ick. I favor adding it unconditionally to compile lines over this.
> See -fmessage-le
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:04:40AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The code for these testcases submitted so far are about 12 lines a piece
> > and have almost nothing which can tell where they came from (Other than
> > comments in the code).
>
> Tha
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The code for these testcases submitted so far are about 12 lines a piece
> and have almost nothing which can tell where they came from (Other than
> comments in the code).
That's probably fine then. IIRC, previous discussion of this has
generally come
On Monday, March 28, 2005, at 12:56 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
> >How do we deal with this, copyright-wise ? Do we have to take special
> >care when deriving test-cases from them ?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:28:43AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> The canonical method I use is to delete all aspects of t
>
> On Monday, March 28, 2005, at 12:56 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
> > How do we deal with this, copyright-wise ? Do we have to take special
> > care when deriving test-cases from them ?
>
> The canonical method I use is to delete all aspects of the program that
> don't influence the bug, comments
Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Might this likely work? And if so, possibly be worthy of consideration to
> enable the more efficient description and optimization of traditional cc0
> target machines (and possibly be beneficial for other ISA's as well)?
It seems like it might work to m
On Monday, March 28, 2005, at 12:56 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
How do we deal with this, copyright-wise ? Do we have to take special
care when deriving test-cases from them ?
The canonical method I use is to delete all aspects of the program that
don't influence the bug, comments, unused/unneeded fu
Hello,
Please send your response for the below (forwarded) message. Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Swami
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:11:38 +0530 (IST)
From: M Ranga Swami Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ted Teah via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gnu.org #2
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 16:08 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2005 03:08 AM, Kazu Hirata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Huh, whey I talked to them on IRC they didn't seem to have implemented
> > this. I'll try to get this issue one of these days.
>
> Ehm. I did in fact implement this.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:08:49PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2005 03:08 AM, Kazu Hirata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Huh, whey I talked to them on IRC they didn't seem to have implemented
> > this. I'll try to get this issue one of these days.
>
> Ehm. I did in fact implement
On Mar 28, 2005 03:08 AM, Kazu Hirata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huh, whey I talked to them on IRC they didn't seem to have implemented
> this. I'll try to get this issue one of these days.
Ehm. I did in fact implement this. The trouble was that inserting
blocks into the worklist got more exp
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Biagio Lucini wrote:
> The gomp branch fails to bootstrap for libtool problems in libgomp.
> Verified on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and on i686-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> It appears that the fix is pretty easy: libgomp/configure (and related files)
> need to b
I want to get the compiling result of SMS(Swing Modulo Scheduling), and I've
compiled many programs using the flag "-O3 -fmodulo-sched", but no loop is SMS
scheduled.
I'm now using gcc 4.0.0 20041212.
Can any one give me a program or a section of program which has loops that can
be SMS schedul
L.S.,
An ex-J3 member has started to apply his bag of test programs on
gfortran - this could result in potentially hundreds of bug reports in
Bugzilla with attached test-code.
How do we deal with this, copyright-wise ? Do we have to take special
care when deriving test-cases from them ?
Thank
35 matches
Mail list logo
