On Friday 15 July 2005 03.42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I need to figure out how I can augment the generated file to get
> the absolute input file position within two rules:
> start file position...end file position.
In the pl1gcc project, I have implemented token offsets across multiple input
fi
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Jul 15, 2005, at 10:27 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
|
| > After examining the source and documentation, it appears to me that
| > in 4.0.* and on mainline one cannot turn off the warning generated
| > by overflow_warning, in, for example,
|
| IIRC the
"Tabony, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What does it mean by "unit none"?
First I'll note that you shouldn't see this when using the DFA
scheduler (define_insn_reservation, etc.). You should only see it
when using the old pipeline description (define_function_unit, etc.).
The old pipelin
> If I were to propose a patch, which way should I go?
Why not check out my recently posted -Wpragmas patch on gcc-patches?
It takes a set of existing non-optional warnings, and gives them an
option that can be used to disable them, which defaults to on
(i.e. -Wno-pragmas is the useful option).
On Jul 15, 2005, at 10:27 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
After examining the source and documentation, it appears to me that in
4.0.* and on mainline one cannot turn off the warning generated by
overflow_warning, in, for example,
IIRC the C standard requires that a warning here but I could be wro
After examining the source and documentation, it appears to me that in
4.0.* and on mainline one cannot turn off the warning generated by
overflow_warning, in, for example,
[descartes:~] lucier% cat test.c
#include
int main() {
if (1048256 * 1048256 < 0)
printf("1");
else
printf("
Hi,
I am trying to add instruction scheduling to a machine description. I
added everything I think I need and the .dfa looks right to me, but when
I compile with -fsched-verbose=10 I get something that looks like this:
;; ==
;; -- basic blo
On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Bharadwaj Yadavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Newer versions of C++ more or less follow the Itanium C++ ABI:
http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html
That started somewhere in gcc 3.x, though I don't know exactly when.
It starte
Bharadwaj Yadavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone please point me to a place where I can get information
> about how gcc (2.96 and later) lays out class instances? In other
> words if I examine the contents of an object pointer, is there a
> document that specifies how the contents of
> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bryce> The FAQ is badly in need of an update - in fact, it should be moved
Bryce> over to the Wiki (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCJ) in order to be easier
Bryce> to update and maintain.
Great idea, I agree.
We've had a lot of trouble with bi
Darwin's memcmp has semantics that are an extension of the language
standard:
The memcmp() function returns zero if the two strings are
identical, oth-
erwise returns the difference between the first two differing bytes
(treated as unsigned char values, so that `\200' is greater
Can someone please point me to a place where I can get information
about how gcc (2.96 and later) lays out class instances? In other
words if I examine the contents of an object pointer, is there a
document that specifies how the contents of the memory with relation
to the pointer correspond to the
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Unless we are going to require reviewing for wiki changes now, too,
> there is no point in this entire discussion.
I beg to disagree: first, we again raised the GFDL issue with RMS,
we may have some new volunteers to help with web pages/documentation,
On Jul 15, 2005, at 12:39 PM, John M. Gabriele wrote:
The faq looks great. I'm paranoid though -- with wiki's, I always worry
some random troll is going to pop in and make tiny incorrect changes
just to mess with everyone. IMO, if you needed some special access
privileges
to make changes (bes
--- Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John M. Gabriele wrote:
>
> > >Yes. How do we go about it? :)
> >
> >
>
> The web pages can be found in the "wwwdocs" module in GCC cvs. Go here
> for details: http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html
>
> Fixes and updates should be submitted to [EMAIL PR
--- Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ranjit Mathew wrote:
>
> >As for your suggestion, I believe the correct place would
> >be "2.8 What features of the Java language are/aren't supported?"
> >in the FAQ:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/java/faq.html#2_8
> >
> >in addition to the front-pag
make bootstrap successful build info:
config.guess states:
i686-pc-linux-gnu
gcc -v states:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /tmp/downloads/gcc-4.0.1/configure
-prefix=/apps/Linux/gcc401 --program-suffix=401
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1
/etc/issue sta
John M. Gabriele wrote:
Ah. Some expansion of that faq item would be useful (re. 1.4 vs 1.5).
Following the link to the JLS page, I see that they are still pointing users
to what looks to me like the Java 1.4 spec (I browsed the online html version's
index, and there's no mention of generics or
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
As for your suggestion, I believe the correct place would
be "2.8 What features of the Java language are/aren't supported?"
in the FAQ:
http://gcc.gnu.org/java/faq.html#2_8
in addition to the front-page (if so desired).
The FAQ is badly in need of an update - in fact
--- Ranjit Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John M. Gabriele wrote:
> > Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/java/index.html and mention
> > how much of the Java 1.5 spec that GCJ currently implements.
> >
> > When I refer folks to GCJ, the first thing they usually ask is,
> > "does it support g
> From: Georg Bauhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Paul Schlie wrote:
>>> From: Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul Schlie wrote:
I don't contest that it may, I simply don't believe it should.
>>> you can't seriously mean that with respect to uninitialized
>>> variables. this would mean you c
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for your quick reply. I have a few more comments though, and
I hope you can take a look at these.
1. After reading the paper, we concluded that the scalar evolutions
are
actually a restricted polynomial form of chains of recurrences by
Bachmann and Zima [6,8]. Is thi
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:44:35PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > As I understand it, the only difference in the bumped version number
> > is the address. Can anyone confirm this?
>
> A simple diff shows other changes, including the all-new shared
> library clause and the change of "Library" to
Original Message
>From: Georg Bauhaus
>Sent: 15 July 2005 14:21
> You can have both, correctness and uninitialised local
> variables. For an impression of the difference in performance,
> and for a way to ensure correctness, I tried this
> (switch register/volatile in the declaration lines
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
(There are at least two bugs in this :-/ but corrections
won't change the picture. Neither will initialisation.)
#define BUFFER_SIZE 1000 // must be > 0
#define ITERATIONS 10 // must be > 0
assert(hi > 0);
for (size_t c=0; c < hi + 2; ++c) {
if (a[c]) {
Paul Schlie wrote:
From: Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul Schlie wrote:
I don't contest that it may, I simply don't believe it should.
you can't seriously mean that with respect to uninitialized
variables. this would mean you could not put local variables in
registers. the effect on c
Kai Ruottu kirjoitti:
Mark Cuss kirjoitti:
So - the question is: How do I do this? Even though LD_LIBRARY_PATH
points to ./ as it's first entry, ldd still looks in /lib first for
ld-linux.so.2. I've tried the rpath option to ld at link time, but
that doesn't work either. It seems that thing
Mark Cuss kirjoitti:
Hello all
I apologize if this is off topic for this list - I wasn't sure exactly
where to ask but I thought this would be a good place to start:
Something for newbies like gcc-help?
I'm trying to get myself a group of libraries that I can distribute with
my program so
In preparation for the future transition to subversion, I've written
some code to merge the old-gcc repository into current mainline. I
would like to see this merged repository used as the basis for the
conversion to subversion. The advantage is that it provides revision
history back to 1992, whe
1a http://dd5dbek.convolve.esouroe.us/?1qT
go.gif
Description: GIF image
John M. Gabriele wrote:
> Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/java/index.html and mention
> how much of the Java 1.5 spec that GCJ currently implements.
>
> When I refer folks to GCJ, the first thing they usually ask is,
> "does it support generics?" "autoboxing?" and so on. That info
> should be rig
Paul Schlie wrote:
In that case you may want to stick with -O0. There are *lots* of
things GCC does that alter undefined cases. How about the undefined
behavior when aliasing rules are violated? Would you want to make
-fno-strict-aliasing be the only supported setting?
- Isn't the purp
32 matches
Mail list logo
