On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 00:44 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 00:36 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > A patch by Andrew Pinski is there:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01666.html
> >
> > But review was negative, so it was not commited.
> >
> > Hope this he
On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:16 PM, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
It is a very simple mark and sweep GC and not realy useful for most
other projects.
You mark each struct for GCable and all static and global variables
too. You cannot
have only a reference to a GCable on the stack (it has to be in a GC
> There's also boehm-gc:
>
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/
>
> which is shipped with gcc for java's use.
>
> Mostly depends on what you're looking at the gc for - whether it's
> for your language, for hacking on gcc, or something else.
Thanks Eric,
--
Stephane Wirtel <[E
On Aug 19, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Hi,
With this page from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
GNU_Compiler_Collection, in the "See also" section,
there is a sentence about a Garbage collected included in GCC.
There's also boehm-gc:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/H
Le Friday 19 August 2005 a 20:08, Andrew Pinski ecrivait:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > With this page from Wikipedia,
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_Collection, in the "See also"
> > section,
> > there is a sentence about a Garbage collected included in GCC.
> >
> > Is it true ?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> With this page from Wikipedia,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_Collection, in the "See also"
> section,
> there is a sentence about a Garbage collected included in GCC.
>
> Is it true ?
Yes.
> If yes, how can I use it with my c++ source code ? (documentation,
> artic
Hi,
With this page from Wikipedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_Collection, in the "See also"
section,
there is a sentence about a Garbage collected included in GCC.
Is it true ?
If yes, how can I use it with my c++ source code ? (documentation,
articles, tutorials...).
Thanks
Hello,
I 'd like to dig into gcc internals, and would like to compile it with -g.
I can't find any document on how to do that? I tried
make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g CFLAGS=-g,
but it still will add '-O2' later on.
Any documentation on how GCC is compiled? what are the stages of the
compilation?
Tha
On Aug 10, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
> + /* APPLE LOCAL begin radar 4153339 */
> + if (n_sets == 1 && GET_CODE (sets[i].src) == REG
> + && src_const && GET_CODE (src_const) == CONST_DOUBLE)
> + {
> + src_folded = src_const;
> + src_folded_cost =
Fariborz is still having problems with his mailer and has asked me to forward this.
On Aug 10, 2005, at 2:35 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
On Aug 10, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
Following patch has exposed an optimization shortcoming:
2005-07-12 Dale Johannesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 00:36 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> A patch by Andrew Pinski is there:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01666.html
>
> But review was negative, so it was not commited.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Laurent
>
> PS: is there a PR for this one?
Thanks to Andrew
tempts to build mainline on darwin8 have failed with a
> bugbox in Ada.
>
> +===GNAT BUG
> DETECTED==+
> | 4.1.0 20050819 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0) GCC
> error: |
> | tree check: expected class ex
Howdy,
My last two attempts to build mainline on darwin8 have failed with a
bugbox in Ada.
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED==+
| 4.1.0 20050819 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0) GCC
error: |
| tree check: expected class expression
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian> The second approach is of course to write a little language which is
> Ian> powerful enough to describe printf. The state machine language I
> Ian> described earlier is too simple and perhaps overly cryptic.
>
> If we're doing that, why not use an al
On Friday, August 19, 2005, at 01:57 PM, Aoun Raza wrote:
I have developed it already, but I want to use GCC
headers.. and I see the problems described earlier
Must be a bug in your compiler, because g++ compiles it just fine, go
ask them.
I have developed it already, but I want to use GCC
headers.. and I see the problems described earlier
--- Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:27:56PM -0700, Aoun Raza
> wrote:
> > I am developing an intermediate compile using EDG
> C++
> > frontend.
>
> Then you are
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:27:56PM -0700, Aoun Raza wrote:
> I am developing an intermediate compile using EDG C++
> frontend.
Then you are on the wrong list.
Hi all,
I am developing an intermediate compile using EDG C++
frontend.
When I try to compile any c++ source file with my
compiler it returns many errors.. like
James:~/C_PP/test> C_CC -I/usr/include/c++/3.3
-I/usr/include/c++/3.3/i486-linux-gnu -I/usr/include
-c helloworld.cpp
"/usr/includ
> "Ian" == Ian Lance Taylor writes:
Ian> To make this kind of thing useful, I see two paths that we can follow.
Ian> The second approach is of course to write a little language which is
Ian> powerful enough to describe printf. The state machine language I
Ian> described earlier is too simpl
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I assume you are trying something like this:
>>
>> int* i = new int[5](23);
>
> While this is not gcc-help, maybe we could make a FAQ item for this.
> For people who want to do something
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> WU Yongwei wrote:
>
> > Well, I see this in the gcc error message. Can someone here kindly
> > point to me which part of the Standard specified this behaviour? I
> > thought it should be in 5.3.4, but was not able to find the wor
I'm porting GCC 4.0.2 to a new VLIW architecture.
There are 10 functions units (2 RISCs and 8 DSPs) in the architecture.
The pipeline stages are: IS, ID(fetch operand), E1(ALU), E2, E3, E4(write back
to register)
For the circuit area reason, the pipeline forwarding mechanism is not available
acr
Full gcc 4.0.1 distribution used for source tree.
Hardware: IBM 9113-550 power5 4-way
bash-2.05b$ /builds/gcc-4.0.1/config.guess
powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
bash-2.05b$ oslevel -r
5300-02
bash-2.05b$ gcc -v
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Yao qi wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
> I have looked through C99 standard, in 6.4.1 Keywords, "_Imaginary" is
> mentioned as a keyword in this standard. However, it seems that GCC can not
> recognize it, report error: '_Imaginary' undeclared. I also search it in GCC
> info, there
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20050819 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20050819/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 CVS branch
with the following options: -D2005-08-19 10:43 UTC
You'll
On 2005-08-18 17:53:24 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:52:36PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2005-08-18 21:53:47 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > Mike Stump wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > printf ("%d", i);
> > [...]
> > > Now imagine that the output of the original program de
WU Yongwei wrote:
> Well, I see this in the gcc error message. Can someone here kindly
> point to me which part of the Standard specified this behaviour? I
> thought it should be in 5.3.4, but was not able to find the words
> there.
>
> By the way, anyone knows the rationale of this behaviour?
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> WU Yongwei wrote:
>
> > Well, I see this in the gcc error message. Can someone here kindly
> > point to me which part of the Standard specified this behaviour? I
> > thought it should be in 5.3.4, but was not able to find the words
> > there.
>
> It might be better if
WU Yongwei wrote:
> Well, I see this in the gcc error message. Can someone here kindly
> point to me which part of the Standard specified this behaviour? I
> thought it should be in 5.3.4, but was not able to find the words
> there.
It might be better if the error message said "non-default
init
29 matches
Mail list logo
