Hi,
The description about the option -fshort-enums on gcc.gnu.org says, that
-fshort-enums is the default on some targets, as required by the platform ABI.
1) Can anyone tell me, on which all targets, this is default?
2) Or if anyone can tell me any document through which I can find the list
Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++
(yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a
final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is anyone
aware of regressions from previous 4.0.x releases that are wrong-code,
ice-on-valid,
Gaurav Gautam, Noida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Can anyone tell me, on which all targets, this is default?
$ grep -r TARGET_DEFAULT_SHORT_ENUMS gcc
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:#undef TARGET_DEFAULT_SHORT_ENUMS
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:#define TARGET_DEFAULT_SHORT_ENUMS arm_default_short_enums
Kaz Kojima wrote:
Joern RENNECKE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I forgot that this is specified to depend on fpscr, and that we
are running
optimize_mode_switching before reload now. This makes this solution
unusable
for TARGET_FMOVD. This means we need to go the secondary / tertiary
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:58:46AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++
(yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a
final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is anyone
aware of
H. J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:58:46AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++
(yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a
final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is anyone
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Hey Bernd,
Has there been any news or progress on reload-branch lately? It
removes a lot of code that I'd dearly love to see gone...
Unfortunately not. I just don't have the time to work on too many extra
projects at the moment :-( Of course, others could always
Snapshot gcc-3.4-20050927 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/3.4-20050927/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 3.4 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-3_4-20050927
You'll find
Zhan Zhaohua [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many of your questions are answered here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html
and here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html
1. We would like to know wether we have to obtain
some special license or
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
07:14 ---
Possible solutions:
1) force double initialization again.
2) add dg-options -pthread for solaris on the given testsuite files
3) link libstdc++ builds on solaris with -pthread. Libjava already does
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-27 07:20
---
(In reply to comment #4)
So, IMHO, this isn't giving up consistency; it's just reflecting inherent
inconsistency through an inconsistent interface.
I see your point. I don't know. This is really matter for
--- Additional Comments From kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
2005-09-27 07:28 ---
All three testcases compile run ok.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19317
This bug is triggered by assigning a private variable of a protected object as
the default expression of its private protected procedure's parameter.
-
$ gnatgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
09:55 ---
This looks like a latent bug in the Ada front-end as the only change to the
middle-end would be the change to use TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT.
No, it isn't, please investigate a minimum before writing such a
--- Additional Comments From nathan at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-27
10:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada bootstrap ICE in
build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:795
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
In build_int_cst_wide, we're asserting that the type of shared constants
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-09-27 11:19
---
With a couple of months old mainline gcc (20050716), following asm is produced:
(-O2 -msse2 -fomit-frame-pointer):
subl$12, %esp
movss b, %xmm0
movss a, %xmm1
unpcklps
--- Additional Comments From zoltan at bendor dot com dot au 2005-09-27
11:30 ---
Subject: A gcc primitive, under special circumstances, can crash the AVR
Additional comment:
The bug can be retired. Atmel confirmed (and the latest AT90CAN128
manual lists it in the errata) that the
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-09-27 11:41
---
I think that following example wins the contest:
vector float f(void) { return (vector float){ a, a, b, b}; }
gcc -O2 -msse -fomit-frame-pointer
subl$28, %esp
movss a, %xmm0
movss
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-09-27 13:07 ---
Now it ICEs again (snapshot gcc-4.1-20050917 + gcc-4.1-20050924)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
13:15 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23853 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
13:15 ---
*** Bug 23079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23853
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
13:43 ---
It looks worse on the mainline:
stmfd sp!, {r4, lr}
mov r4, r0
bl func
add r4, r4, r0
ldrbr3, [r4, #-4] @ zero_extendqisi2
cmp r3,
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
13:45 ---
Still happens on the mainline:
cmn r0, r1
rsb r3, r1, r0
rsbne r3, r0, r1
mov r0, r3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11826
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
13:46 ---
Fixed on the mainline:
stmfd sp!, {r4, lr}
mov r1, r1, asl #8
mov r0, r0, asl #16
mov r2, r1, asr #31
addsr3, r1, r0
adc r4, r2, r0, asr
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-09-27 14:01
---
Then the issue you are seeing is a separate one, and we would need to
have a smaller testcase to figure out what is going on. Please try to
work on finding one so that we can look at it.
Thanks
Wolfgang
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
14:33 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I think that following example wins the contest:
vector float f(void) { return (vector float){ a, a, b, b}; }
For this, it is a different bug. The issue with the above is that
--- Additional Comments From Woebbeking at web dot de 2005-09-27 14:38
---
Subject: Re: mt allocator doesn't pthread_key_delete its keys
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:03, bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-26
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 14:43
---
If you are compiling with -fvisibility*, then the problem is PR libstdc++/22482,
not this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22309
Take the following code:
vector int bar3(long long x)
{
return (vector int)(vector long long){x,x};
}
---
Currently we get:
_bar3:
mfspr r0,256
stw r0,-8(r1)
oris r0,r0,0x8000
mtspr 256,r0
addi r2,r1,-32
stw r3,0(r2)
stw r4,4(r2)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
14:56 ---
This is with -maltivec -O2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24082
--- Additional Comments From steinmtz at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-27
15:06 ---
Problem goes away if the -freorder-blocks-and-partition option is removed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24069
--- Additional Comments From abalkiss at redhat dot com 2005-09-27 15:15
---
This has been fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-09-27
15:21 ---
Working on a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
15:33 ---
Java bugs are not release critical; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18048
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23301
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24020
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21550
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20972
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16194
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23694
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23336
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23522
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23426
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23205
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21419
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23570
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19923
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14777
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21383
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17577
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23229
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22352
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21228
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23170
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23440
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22405
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22563
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21036
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15855
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21304
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23821
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21724
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16876
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23965
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17796
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21627
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22017
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24037
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23871
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23090
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21008
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23576
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19672
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23290
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21715
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22293
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13931
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22002
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17383
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21592
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20983
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23797
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23324
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22603
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16913
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18071
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17789
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
