Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5?

Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 05:09:20PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > ld32: FATAL 2 : Internal: at ../../ld/section_type.c In load_info() >> > unknown section type >> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >

Re: Some svn numbers

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 18:08 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:42 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > So, Mike Stump said his update times with svn from toolchain.org > > were a > > little slow. > > > Let me know if it's still slow for you. > > Ok, had a chance to upgrade my svn to 1.2.3

Re: Some svn numbers

> Emacs: Well I'm just wondering why there still isn't any direct svn > protocol implementation written in lisp for it :-) Maybe it got a bit > out of fashion... After al svk is perl at it's "best". > There is actually a java reimplementation of the svn protocol :) Lisp implementation of the

Re: Some svn numbers

On 2005-10-13, at 03:26, Mike Stump wrote: On Oct 12, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Marcin Dalecki wrote: On 2005-10-12, at 04:42, Daniel Berlin wrote: Checkouts will be about 30% slower with svn, just because it has to write more data out to disk because of the working copy Yes. Indeed. One suggest

Re: Some svn numbers

On Oct 12, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Marcin Dalecki wrote: On 2005-10-12, at 04:42, Daniel Berlin wrote: Checkouts will be about 30% slower with svn, just because it has to write more data out to disk because of the working copy Yes. Indeed. One suggestions comes immediately to my mind. Why don't yo

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 05:39:17PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 12, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > >Volker Reichelt wrote: > >>Btw, I get no response for > >>ping gcc.gnu.org > >>Is this intended? Or does this also need fixing? > >> > > > >It is intentional. > > ? > > mrs $ ping

Re: Some svn numbers

On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:42 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: So, Mike Stump said his update times with svn from toolchain.org were a little slow. Let me know if it's still slow for you. Ok, had a chance to upgrade my svn to 1.2.3, and time from gcc.gnu.org: $ cd gcc $ time svn update *.c [ lots o ou

Re: Some svn numbers

On 2005-10-12, at 04:42, Daniel Berlin wrote: Checkouts will be about 30% slower with svn, just because it has to write more data out to disk because of the working copy Yes. Indeed. One suggestions comes immediately to my mind. Why don't you provide some kind of COW (Copy on Write)? Or may

Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types

On Oct 12, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Thomas Costa wrote: gcc doesn't have such a warning at present. Yup. Is this correct? I suspect so. What are the chances of adding such a warning? Zero, unless someone else wants it or you file a bug report asking for the enhancement. Be sure to explain

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

On Oct 12, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: Volker Reichelt wrote: Btw, I get no response for ping gcc.gnu.org Is this intended? Or does this also need fixing? It is intentional. ? mrs $ ping gcc.gnu.org PING gcc.gnu.org (209.132.176.174): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 209.132.176.1

Re: adding a MIPS instruction with operands to GCC

On Oct 12, 2005, at 4:40 PM, guru venky wrote: I am trying to add a mips instruction with operands to gcc. Basically I want an instruction that acts as marker for a future instruction. as an example, if i want a marker for addi R1,constant (add immediate) instruction, i would do something lik

adding a MIPS instruction with operands to GCC

I am trying to add a mips instruction with operands to gcc. Basically I want an instruction that acts as marker for a future instruction. as an example, if i want a marker for addi R1,constant (add immediate) instruction, i would do something like marker constant to be emitted by gcc. can anyo

Re: Error at compiling linux-2.6.13.4

Antonín Kolísek wrote: compiling linux-2.6.13.4 (vanilla) on my PC (linux-2.6.13.1, gcc-3.3.6, glibc-2.3.5). gcc-3.3.6 isn't being maintained anymore, which means we aren't going to fix this. You will need to use a more recent gcc version, or find a way to workaround the problem, for instanc

Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:06:41PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:24:41PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:49:44AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > How does one set z = 0 - I 0 in a portable

Ideas for compile-time checking of exception specifications.

There seem to be some arguments floating around about why it may not be a good idea to implement compile time checking of exception specifications. However, I'm not sure that I agree with these arguments. I think the purveyors of these arguments have the point of view that any such feature wo

Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:48:49PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > Unfortunately, the point of my original question > was missed. gcc is not following Annex G in n1124.pdf. > In particular, see G.5.1 Multiplicative operators. > > y = copysign(0, -1); > z = I * y; /* This should be computed as (i1)*

Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero?

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:24:41PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:49:44AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > How does one set z = 0 - I 0 in a portable manner with gcc? > > > > z = conj(0); > > > > I came to your solution

Re: GCC Installation Problem - Please help....

Renju Anand wrote: I'm facing compilation problem during GCC( 3.2.2 ) installation in LynxOS under x86 platform. You didn't say what kind of problems you ran into. Without details, we can't really help. I can say that, historically, the LynxOS support in FSF gcc has been poor, and unlike

Re: cross build gcc 4.0/4.1 fail

Cauchy Song wrote: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -O2 ... /opt/cvs_work/gcc40-branch/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/./_muldi3.o In file included from /opt/cvs_work/gcc40-branch/gcc/libgcc2.c:56: /opt/cvs_work/gcc40-branch/gcc/libgcc2.h:34: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC visibility /opt/cvs_work/gcc40-branch/gcc/lib

Re: A New Architecture

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The GCC testing framework is so complicated to understand. It is built on top of the DejaGnu which are built on top of Expect which are built on top of Tcl and Autoconf which .. You don't need autoconf etc to run dejagnu. These are needed only if you want to

Re: Basic block duplication

> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:38:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> For very small procedures (3-5 basic blocks) I don't have a problem, but >> for larger (> 5 basic block) procedures I go boom. Can someone please >> shed some light on my error? > > You didn't say how you go boom. > > > r~ >

Re: Explicit NOPs for a VLIW Machine

Balaji V. Iyer wrote: I am porting GCC 4.0.0 to a proprietary VLIW machine, and I want to insert NOPs explicitly wherever there is an Output/Flow/Anti dependencies. I am currently doing this insertion in the machine dependent reorganization phase. Is there a way to do this in machine descript

Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types

I posted this on the gcc-help list but I haven't received any replies so I thought that might mean that I hadn't missed anything obvious and gcc doesn't have such a warning at present. Is this correct? What are the chances of adding such a warning? Is it basic enough to add to the 3.4.x and/or

Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:24:41PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:49:44AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > How does one set z = 0 - I 0 in a portable manner with gcc? > > z = conj(0); > I came to your solution after posting my question. Unfortunately, the point of my

Re: Basic block duplication

> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:38:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> For very small procedures (3-5 basic blocks) I don't have a problem, but >> for larger (> 5 basic block) procedures I go boom. Can someone please >> shed some light on my error? > > You didn't say how you go boom. > > > r~ >

Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:49:44AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > How does one set z = 0 - I 0 in a portable manner with gcc? z = conj(0); r~

Re: Basic block duplication

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:38:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For very small procedures (3-5 basic blocks) I don't have a problem, but > for larger (> 5 basic block) procedures I go boom. Can someone please > shed some light on my error? You didn't say how you go boom. r~

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

stuck FYI, according to my logs, rsync://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-cvs stopped working less than hour after 20051010 201701 GMT and resumed working at most one hour before 20051012 141701 GMT. Laurent

Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

> > Not really a problem for a number of reasons. First, it's LC_CTYPE > > you're thinking of. Second, the narrow character set can only be 16-bits > > wide if "char" is 16-bits. Thirdly, if the character set that LC_CTYPE > > selects isn't superset of the POSIX portable character set then resul

Re: Whats the real penalty of non-mmap ggc?

Ideally, though, you would find some chunk of address space that is always free on your OS and just use that with mmap; that's pretty much guaranteed to be faster and more reliable. Aha thanks. I looked at host-linux.c and adapted its gt_pch_get_address to taste, added that to host-sco.c and now

Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC

On 10/12/05, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 10 October 2005 19:25, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > Could we just have -fwrite-ipo create a '.o' file that contains the > > intermediate representation (instead of being a real object file). > > > > Then when the linker is called it wou

complex arithmetic and signed zero?

How does one set z = 0 - I 0 in a portable manner with gcc? My obvious attempts give surprising results. #include #include #include int main(void) { double complex z; double x, y; x = 0.; y = copysign(0, -1); printf("%e %e\n", x, y); /* __real__ and __imag__ aren't require

Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross Ridge) writes: > >The POSIXy way to do that would be to refer to the LC_CHARSET > >environment variable, but then consider > > > >LC_CHARSET=UTF-16 c99 foo.c > > > >where 'foo.c' is in UTF-16 and contains '#include ', > > Not really a problem for a number of reasons. Firs

Re: Whats the real penalty of non-mmap ggc?

Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > After days spent trying to get a clean gmake check run, I am down to > the last few failures. They are all related to the PCH tests, and they > all > fail the same way: "largefile.c:1: fatal error: had to relocate PCH". > Previously, *all* P

Whats the real penalty of non-mmap ggc?

Hi all, After days spent trying to get a clean gmake check run, I am down to the last few failures. They are all related to the PCH tests, and they all fail the same way: "largefile.c:1: fatal error: had to relocate PCH". Previously, *all* PCH tests were failing but I crafted a host file that u

Successful gcc4.0.2 build (Redhat 9, Kernel 2.4.25)

make bootstrap successful build info: config.guess states: i686-pc-linux-gnu gcc -v states: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /tmp/downloads/gcc-4.0.2/configure -prefix=/apps/Linux/gcc402 --program-suffix=402 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.2 /etc/issue sta

Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 05:09:20PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ld32: FATAL 2 : Internal: at ../../ld/section_type.c In load_info() > > unknown section type > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > gmake[4]: *** [libstdc++.la] Error 1 > >

Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5?

Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ld32: FATAL 2 : Internal: at ../../ld/section_type.c In load_info() > unknown section type > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > gmake[4]: *** [libstdc++.la] Error 1 Which version of ld do you use? I'm having problems with MIPSpro 7.4.3m ld o

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

Volker Reichelt wrote: Btw, I get no response for ping gcc.gnu.org Is this intended? Or does this also need fixing? It is intentional. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

Basic block duplication

During the instruction scheduling pass (before reload) I'm interested in doing some basic block duplication. Specifically, I'm working in the sched-rgn.c code. I've looked through the tracer.c and bb-reorder.c code, but I'm missing something! To begin testing I just made the reorder chain the same

Re: Global variable clobbering and statics

On Wednesday 12 October 2005 10:23, Daniel Berlin wrote: > The GV heuristic is actually wrong in a lot of cases, in part because we > Wrong? Meaning that it causes us to generate bad code? Or did you mean pessimistic? I can believe the latter. > LLVM actually does something like this to make

Re: Global variable clobbering and statics

> Yes, that is true. However, I am looking for graceful degradation > mechanisms, while trying to keep SSA semantics. I would like to be able > to trigger grouping mechanisms both in call-clobbering and aliasing > without just Giving Up Hard. To add insult to injury, we give up too late > (

Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC

On Monday 10 October 2005 19:25, Steve Ellcey wrote: > Could we just have -fwrite-ipo create a '.o' file that contains the > intermediate representation (instead of being a real object file). > > Then when the linker is called it would call the compiler with all the > files that have intermediate

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

On 12 Oct, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Volker Reichelt wrote: >> >> since two days I cannot synchronize my gcc repository using rsync >> anymore. Nothing happens and after a some time I get the following >> error message: > > Some stale connections were clogging up the rsync port - there's a > con

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

> > since two days I cannot synchronize my gcc repository using rsync > > anymore. Nothing happens and after a some time I get the following > > error message: > > > > rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) > > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(584) > >

Re: Global variable clobbering and statics

On Wednesday 12 October 2005 09:55, Daniel Berlin wrote: > a is static. > D'oh, sorry. I missed this bit.

Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

On Oct 12, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Adriaan van Os wrote: Mark Mitchell wrote: As previously announced, here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only fixes for regressions. The development rules at

Re: Global variable clobbering and statics

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:51 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 22:16, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 20:44 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > > > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 20:30, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > BTW, you are also screwing up the upwards fud-chains in c

Re: Global variable clobbering and statics

On Tuesday 11 October 2005 22:16, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 20:44 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 20:30, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > BTW, you are also screwing up the upwards fud-chains in cases where > > > it really does clobber A, since you'll get the

Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

Mark Mitchell wrote: As previously announced, here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only fixes for regressions. The development rules at use the word "bug", not the word "

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

Volker Reichelt wrote: since two days I cannot synchronize my gcc repository using rsync anymore. Nothing happens and after a some time I get the following error message: Some stale connections were clogging up the rsync port - there's a connection limit of 16. Nearly all of them were from AM

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:08 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:14 +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > since two days I cannot synchronize my gcc repository using rsync > > anymore. Nothing happens and after a some time I get the following > > error message: > > > > r

Re: 4.0.2 bootstrap comparison failure on AIX 5.3

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:58:04PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > Albert Chin writes: > > Albert> I've built gcc-4.0.2 as follows on AIX 5.3 and am receiving a > Albert> bootstrap comparison failure: > Albert> $ CC=/usr/vac/bin/cc CONFIG_SHELL=/opt/fsw/bin/bash \ > > Albert> I don't see any

Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5?

I'm getting a SGI linker bug building 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5.23m and 6.5.26m: $ cd /opt/build $ bzip2 -dc /opt/src/devel/gcc-4.0.2/src/gcc-4.0.2.tar.bz2 | tar xf - $ mkdir gcc $ cd gcc $ CC=cc /opt/build/gcc-4.0.2/configure --enable-shared \ --with-gnu-as --with-as="/opt/TWWfsw/gcc402/mips-s

Re: Some svn numbers

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 14:18 +0100, Nix wrote: > On 12 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin murmured woefully: > > (I'd recommend a 1.2.x client, or 1.3.x in a few weeks. 1.2.x has much > > fsater working copy than 1.2.x) > > So this is some sort of Zen version control, is it? :) > > (I assume you mean that 1

Re: Some svn numbers

On 12 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin murmured woefully: > (I'd recommend a 1.2.x client, or 1.3.x in a few weeks. 1.2.x has much > fsater working copy than 1.2.x) So this is some sort of Zen version control, is it? :) (I assume you mean that 1.2.x is much faster than 1.1.x, and 1.3.x is a little faster

Re: rsync access seems to be broken

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:14 +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote: > Hi, > > since two days I cannot synchronize my gcc repository using rsync > anymore. Nothing happens and after a some time I get the following > error message: > > rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) > rsync error: error in

Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Compiler version: 4.0.2 Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure flags: - --prefix=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/install - --with-gnu-as - --with-as=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/as - --with-gnu-l

Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Compiler version: 4.0.2 Platform: mips-sgi-irix6.5 configure flags: - - --prefix=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install - - --with-gnu-as - - --with-as=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install/bin/as - - --with-gnu-ld - - --with-l

Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Compiler version: 4.0.2 Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu configure flags: - --prefix=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/install - --with-gnu-as - --with-as=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/install/bin/as - --with-gnu-ld - --with-ld=/SCRAT

Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Compiler version: 4.0.2 Platform: mips-sgi-irix6.5 configure flags: - --prefix=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install - --with-gnu-as - --with-as=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install/bin/as - --with-gnu-ld - --with-ld=/SCRATCH

Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Compiler version: 4.0.2 Platform: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 configure flags: - --prefix=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/HP-UX/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/install - --with-gnu-as - --with-as=/SCRATCH/gcc-build/HP-UX/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/install/bin/as - --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bi

Re: -fprofile-arcs and gcov: data without exit()

Joe Buck wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:01:07PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote: call __gcov_flush It seems you could just invoke that function from gdb, and not change the program at all, right? that's a neat idea :) nathan -- Nathan Sidwell:: http://www.codesourcery.com ::

rsync access seems to be broken

Hi, since two days I cannot synchronize my gcc repository using rsync anymore. Nothing happens and after a some time I get the following error message: rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(584) Could somebody please