On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 02:14 +, shreyas krishnan wrote:
> Hi
> I am trying to understand the workings of alias analysis and why
> it behaves it a particular way. I am using the alias analysis branch
> of gcc4.0
>
> I find that for the following snippet of code
> main(
Hi
I am trying to understand the workings of alias analysis and why
it behaves it a particular way. I am using the alias analysis branch
of gcc4.0
I find that for the following snippet of code
main()
{
foo(A)
}
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20051125 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20051125/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:17:42PM -0500, Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> >>
> >>The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant
> >>complexity
> >>(ISO/IEC 14882:1998, pp. 461, T
David,
Thanks for the clarification. While one could argue that the breakage was
due to an aggressive introduction of changes into gfortran of the gcc 4.1
branch,
it is definitely is more honest to say that the Darwin target has been broken
for sometime now with the weakref failures in the gcc
> Jack Howarth writes:
Jack> My question is whether the gcc 4.1 release would be
Jack> held to fix this or will the Darwin target just be marked as broken for
Jack> that release?
The release will be held. Quoting the GCC development plan:
"If ... support for a platform with active m
On Friday 25 November 2005 17.49, Michael Garvin wrote:
> Hi! I would like to contribute as a developer to gcc.
excellent!
> I was just thinking the beginner stuff would be a
> good way to get started.
the pl1gcc.sourceforge.net front-end project could really need some hands on
the integration
In case folks haven't noticed, there has been major breakage of
the gfortran in gcc 4.1 on Darwin. The problem appears to be due to
the fact that weakrefs aren't properly honored in the Darwin linker.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991
This apparently is the same issue causin
Not sure if it will work by try
make check RUNBTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{, --param foo=blah}'"
Actuallt that runs the suites twice. Once with no extra args,
once with --param foo=blah. If you only want to run it once
try removing the leading comma. Thus:
make check RUNBTESTFLAGS="--target
Richard Guenther wrote:
I wonder what magic is required to run the testsuite with an extra
--param foo=blah argument. Just using
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target-board=unix/--param foo=blah"
fails because of the space, trying to be clever and doing
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target-board=unix/--param/foo=blah"
r
I wonder what magic is required to run the testsuite with an extra
--param foo=blah argument. Just using
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target-board=unix/--param foo=blah"
fails because of the space, trying to be clever and doing
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target-board=unix/--param/foo=blah"
results in --param -mfoo b
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:59 -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > > > > Actually, i just removed the need for most stat calls during
> > > > > update in 1.4.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Dan, that's great, but for the remaining i/o calls, it
> > > > really does matter if you use long/paths/with/lots/of
Hi Alan,
the problem you point out is really just the tip of the iceberg --
currently reload frequently decides it *will* perform an action in the
future, and assumes that other code will anyway behave as if that action
had already been completed ...
This is why e.g. the 'm' constraint accepts *a
On Nov 25, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Phil Edwards wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant
complexity
(ISO/IEC 14882:1998, pp. 461, Table 65), while the std::list::size
() in
current STL of GCC is defined as { std::d
> > > > Actually, i just removed the need for most stat calls during
> > > > update in 1.4.
> > >
> > > Thanks Dan, that's great, but for the remaining i/o calls, it
> > > really does matter if you use long/paths/with/lots/of/slashes
> > > rather than chdir and ./filenames instead. I belie
Hi! I would like to contribute as a developer to gcc. I was looking at
the open projects page, and in the beginner projects section, I think
there are many that I could easily tackle. I would like to jump in and
start contributing, but I'm wondering if I need to create a designer
account anywher
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 12:53, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> GENERIC -> GIMPLE -> LLVM -> GIMPLE -> RTL
>
> That design adds two phases (GIMPLE -> LLVM, LLVM -> GIMPLE) here --
> perhaps simple one, perhaps not. The line is very straight, but adding
> two more segments make me wonder if we'
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
>
> The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant complexity
> (ISO/IEC 14882:1998, pp. 461, Table 65), while the std::list::size() in
> current STL of GCC is defined as { std::distance(begin(), end()); }, whose
> complexiy is
On 11/22/05, Scott Robert Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been quietly watching the conversation, largely as an interested
> user as opposed to a GCC developer. One of my concerns lies with:
I have worked on some toy front ends, so I think that I am a kind of a
user also :)
> GENERI
This mailing list is dedicated to GCC development, so please send your
email to `gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org' mailing list which is a list
dedicated to helping GCC users.
Cheers,
Karel
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, FRANCIS MACHOKA wrote:
hallos? I am a linux user and I want to learn how to
use
hallos? I am a linux user and I want to learn how to
use GCC and become a master in it.
Is it possible for me to get full documentation and
tutorials?
If they are small enough, can they be posted to me via
email?
If they are pdf,s can I get links to where I can
download them from?
Please assist.
On 11/25/05, Branko Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 10:14 -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > > > Hi Dan,
> > > >
> > > > (BTW, sorry for the reposted messages.)
> > > >
> > > > While I was waiting for some svn commands to finish (cleanup,
> >
22 matches
Mail list logo
