On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:33:31PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 11:45:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Alan Modra writes:
> > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:35:31AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > > > spawns a recursive make (GNU make 3.80) that consumes some 450MB of
> >
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:05:46PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> 1) Make long double == double. This is what Arm does, amongst others. This
> pretty much just works and should reduce the amount of support code required.
> Anyone wanting more than IEEE double precision has to use a third party
> bugn
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20051208 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20051208/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Dec 8, 2005, at 8:05 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
1) Make long double == double.
Eventually the day will come when one want something bigger, then,
you have to break abi for this. We did this on darwin, and ick,
whatta pain. I think I prefer a hard error for even mentioning long
double, as
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>| I also notice we have a "Releases" link under "About GCC" in the top
>| left corner of the main GCC page that doesn't look like it has been
>| updated in quite a while for any releases. Should this be updated or
>| removed?
> As for 4.x, it is not cle
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:33:46AM -0800, Chris Miller wrote:
> I noticed on your web page that the GCC 3.4.5 manuals are available.
>
> Is there any way to get comparable download possibilities for the GCC
> 3.4.3 manuals?
The only differences between 3.4.3 and 3.4.5 are bug fixes, both in
the
Hi,
I need to generate a gcc binary that will always enable the -fabi-version=1,
because I have a library built with gcc 3.3 and I need to link with it, but
I would like to use gcc 4.
Is there a simple way to do this (a configure option,..) ? or do I need to
patch the gcc/c-cppbuiltin.c file
I noticed on your web page that the GCC 3.4.5 manuals are available.
Is there any way to get comparable download possibilities for the GCC
3.4.3 manuals?
Thanks for your help,
Chris Miller
Senior Technical Writer
LynuxWorks, Inc.
The GCC CompileFarm machines are now online, many thanks to the
jexiste.org staff and to the FSF France staff for making this possible.
GCC developpers wishing to get ssh access should send me their
preferred login together with the line to add to their
$HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys to allow for pass
I have noticed that when I search the mailing lists the earliest
messages
are from May 2005. I don't see anything before that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
Search 'fortran' which shows the first message is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg01645.html
which was posted May 31, 2005.
However
We (CodeSourcery) currently working on developing ColdFire targeted GNU
toolchains (gcc, etc).
Currently gcc nominally uses a 12-byte "extended" precision type for the C
"long double" floating point type. This is inherited from the m68k gcc port,
but doesn't really make a whole lot of sense for
On 12/8/05, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have added FDO runs to the daily tramp3d tester and am observing
> "intersting" things there.
Btw. I finally was able to move it to public webspace. You can have a look
at http://www.suse.de/~rguenther/
Richard.
On Thursday 08 December 2005 13:11, Richard Guenther wrote:
> look at those CSE numbers!
Why do they surprise you?
> The profile generating numbers suggest we're either doing something
> stupid, or that we want some heuristics applied to not instrument
> every edge, but only interesting ones.
We
running 'make' yields the following error:
ranlib -c ./libgcov.a
# When builting multilibbed target libraries, all the required
# libraries are expected to exist in the multilib directory.
MLIBS=`/Users/martinol/auto_v4.0/third/build-helios/gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/Users/martinol/auto_v4.0/third/build
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 21:55 -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > This is *already* wrong, AFAICT, because reg:QI 58 is uninitialized, and
> > we are trying to use it's value. Why do we do this?
>
> This may have been a rhetorical question, but the
Hi. I've noticed a few things about the new stack protector
implementation in gcc-4.1, which are different from the Etoh's IBM
patch that we've been using on Gentoo in the gcc-3 series for a good
while now.
Looking back through the list archives, I see this has been discussed
before, but not rea
I have added FDO runs to the daily tramp3d tester and am observing
"intersting" things there. First of all, compile time with
-fprofile-generate (w/o leafify) skyrocketed from ~120s to 440s.
For reference, here's the hot spots in -ftime-report:
life analysis : 24.66 ( 6%) usr 0.00 (
Good day.
I have one question.
GCC-ARM support prgmas or attributes for override command line parameters
like ARM, THUMB, INTERWORK for selected function?
I find in binutils followed directives but can't find it in GCC.
.code [16|32]: This directive selects the instruction set being generated.
> libaddr2line used to be a proprietary library distributed by AdaCore
> only.
This is wrong, libaddr2line never was proprietary. It can't be in any case,
since it's based on binutils.
> IIRC, libaddr2line never was suitable for tasking.
This is also wrong, GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic is suitable fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
