precompiled headers tests failed

2006-02-07 Thread Eric Fisher
Hi, I think I've got the answer from GCC Bugzilla Bug 11341. It said that this was possibly a known problem with cygwin. For some reason cygwin has always had problems with PCH. Then I run the testsuite on the linux and most of them passed. Thanks for your time. Eric.

Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on

2006-02-07 Thread John David Anglin
> I found the cause for the bootstrap failure. > > Normally I pass "-mpa-risc-2-0" to the boostrap compiler. This bug should now be fixed. See . Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Counc

gcc-3.4-20060207 is now available

2006-02-07 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-3.4-20060207 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/3.4-20060207/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 3.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Toplevel bootstrap only - where are we?

2006-02-07 Thread Mark Mitchell
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Paolo's recent post on gcc-patches reminded me of all the toplevel > libgcc changes I have pending. To recap, the dependence is: if libgcc > is moved out of the top level, the "configure --disable-bootstrap; make > bootstrap" approach will no longer work. Building witho

Re: SOLVED: Wrestling with exceptions on win32 gcj 4.1

2006-02-07 Thread tHE DPR
hello, i was able to solve my problem (see http://gcc.gnu.org//ml/java/2006-02/msg00047.html) by applying *any* of the two patches below. since both patches apply to gcc i'm cc'ing to gcc list too. i'm not 100% sure if my solution is correct. maybe just some exception data is mangled in some wa

Re: fvisibility-inlines-hidden

2006-02-07 Thread Mark Mitchell
Howard Hinnant wrote: > Let me rephrase: It seems to me that fvisibility-inlines-hidden should > apply to all inline functions (both member and non-member). Does > anyone have an argument for why it should not be this way? I certainly do not. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Machine Dependance

2006-02-07 Thread Rafael EspĂ­ndola
> Hey Paolo thanx a lot.I got the info I required. > Can u mention any links that i can use as a reference to understand the dump > output of -fdump-tree-original-raw as AST? read GENERIC and GIMPLE: A new tree representation for entire functions at http://zenii.linux.org.uk/~ajh/gcc/gccsu

RE: Trying to map absolute sections

2006-02-07 Thread Dave Korn
On 07 February 2006 04:44, Tarun wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to map an elf section to absolute address. Is there any way > that we can restrain the linker (ld) not to relocate a section and place > it at an absolute address. > > I have tried placing the absolute address in the Sh_Addr and upd

[patch] PR22097: libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5

2006-02-07 Thread Rainer Emrich
This patch fixes bootstrap failure in ligfortran/instrisics/c99_functions.c for mips-sgi-irix6.5. This patch applies cleanly to 4.1 and mainline. It's similiar as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01578.html Patch applied, bootstrap finished successfully for 4.1 svn revision 110639. Test

Re: C++, export for templates (was: C++ standard)

2006-02-07 Thread Tarjei Knapstad
On 2/6/06, Ryan Mansfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Couldn't find anything on it in bugzilla, and I don't think it's worth > > the effort. IIRC, Herb Sutter and another guy spent 6 months to get it > > right in the EDG front end (and Herb originally wanted to throw export > > for templates o